Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
City of Los Angeles v. Patel, 576 U.S. 409 (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a Los Angeles law, Municipal Code § 41.49, requiring hotel operators to retain records about guests for a 90-day period, is facially unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution because it does not allow for pre-compliance review.
For example, in the European Union the Consumer Rights Directive of 2011 obliges member states to give purchasers the right to return goods or cancel services purchased from a business away from a normal commercial premises, such as online, mail order, or door-to-door, with limited exceptions, within two weeks or one year if the seller did not ...
This was called "cash and carry." [5] In 1953, Smart & Final merged with Haas, Baruch & Co. [5] In 1984, it was acquired by Thriftimart. [5] In 1991, it was reorganized via a corporate spin-off and initial public offering. [6] In 1992, it announced a joint venture with Calimax to open stores in Mexico. [3] In 1994, it opened its first store in ...
UPDATED with latest: Forty-five minutes before he addressed the public on Wednesday, Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti signed a new “Targeted Stay at Home Order.” Instead, Garcetti flooded the ...
Dec.04 -- The Mayor of Los Angeles issued a stark warning on Wednesday warning residents to stay home to help stop the spread of the coronavirus. "It's time to hunker down, it's time to cancel ...
After completing 15 days of work for Dynamex, Lee stopped providing delivery services for Dynamex. [26] Three months later, on April 15, 2005, he filed a class action suit against Dynamex in the Los Angeles County Superior Court on behalf of himself and all other similarly-situated Dynamex drivers.
41.18, also known as Los Angeles Municipal Code, Section 41.18(d) (1963, amended 2021), is an ordinance in Los Angeles mandating by law that there will be no "sitting, lying, or sleeping, or ... storing, using, maintaining, or placing personal property in the public right-of-way."
Calling out a fraudulent statement from the buyer: If you can prove there is a scam afoot, you may also be able to cancel a sale. For instance, if a potential buyer takes advantage of an older ...