Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Fernandez v. California , 571 U.S. 292 (2014), was a U.S. Supreme Court case that explored the limits of Georgia v. Randolph , a 2006 case that held that consent to search a dwelling is invalid in the presence of an objecting co-resident. [ 1 ]
Air Wisconsin Airlines Corp. v. Hoeper 571 U.S. ___ (2014) Aviation and Transportation Security Act • immunity to liability for defamation claims • material falsity standard
This model compares real-time data sets of insurance coverage in 2014 to a baseline scenario without ACA coverage. By doing so, the model can project future enrollment numbers in California health programs. According to this model, at some point in time, an estimated 1.1 to 1.3 million Californians will be enrolled in Covered California.
National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius, 567 U.S. 519 (2012), is a landmark [2] [3] [4] United States Supreme Court decision in which the Court upheld Congress's power to enact most provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), commonly called Obamacare, [5] [6] and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act (HCERA), including a requirement for most ...
North Coast Women's Care Medical Group, Inc. v. San Diego County Superior Court (44 Cal. 4th 1145) is a case decided before the California Supreme Court on August 18, 2008, ruling that physicians must offer IUI infertility services to gays and lesbians despite religious objections or find a colleague in their office who will do so.
National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra, 585 U.S. 755 (2018), was a case before the Supreme Court of the United States addressing the constitutionality of California's FACT Act, which mandated that crisis pregnancy centers provide certain disclosures about state services.
California v. Texas , 593 U.S. 659 (2021), was a United States Supreme Court case that dealt with the constitutionality of the 2010 Affordable Care Act (ACA), colloquially known as Obamacare. It was the third such challenge to the ACA seen by the Supreme Court since its enactment.
Eight years after MICRA’s enactment, the first case decided by the California Supreme Court was American Bank & Trust v. Community Hospital, 33 Cal. 3d 674 (1983). In a 4-3 opinion, the majority found that the periodic payment provision violated equal protection, because it treated malpractice plaintiffs differently from other plaintiffs that ...