Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Albert Venn Dicey, KC, FBA (4 February 1835 – 7 April 1922) was a British Whig jurist and constitutional theorist. [1] He is most widely known as the author of Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution (1885). [ 2 ]
1. The Legislative and the Rule of Law; 2. The Executive and the Rule of Law; 3. Criminal Process and the Rule of Law; 4. The Judiciary and Legal Profession under the Rule of Law. The committees set up during the congress were each dedicated to one of the four themes with the Working Paper providing the basis of the discussions.
[12] [11] According to Dicey, the rule of law, in turn, relies on judicial independence. [13] In Introduction, Dicey distinguishes a historical understanding of the constitution's development from a legal understanding of constitutional law as it stands at a point in time. He writes that the latter is his subject. [14] However, J. W. F. Allison ...
The ancient concept of rule of law can be distinguished from rule by law, according to political science professor Li Shuguang: "The difference ... is that, under the rule of law, the law is preeminent and can serve as a check against the abuse of power. Under rule by law, the law is a mere tool for a government, that suppresses in a legalistic ...
The term is not used in contemporary English law, but two similar concepts are natural justice, which generally applies only to decisions of administrative agencies and some types of private bodies like trade unions, and the British constitutional concept of the rule of law as articulated by A. V. Dicey and others.
The concept is exclusive to the UK Parliament and therefore does not extend to the Scottish Parliament, the Senedd and the Northern Ireland Assembly. [2] The traditional view put forward by A. V. Dicey is that parliament had the power to make any law except any law that bound its successors. Formally speaking however, the present state that is ...
The claimed continual complication of the law may be contrary to a claimed simple and eternal natural law—although there is no consensus on what this natural law is, even among advocates. Supporters of democracy point to the complex bureaucracy and regulations that has occurred in dictatorships, like many of the former Communist states .
In philosophy of law, law as integrity is a theory of law put forward by Ronald Dworkin. In general, it can be described as interpreting the law according to a community . [ 1 ]