Ad
related to: plato meno knowledge paradox bookebay.com has been visited by 1M+ users in the past month
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Meno (/ ˈ m iː n oʊ /; Ancient Greek: Μένων, Ménōn) is a Socratic dialogue written by Plato around 385 BC., but set at an earlier date around 402 BC. [1] Meno begins the dialogue by asking Socrates whether virtue (in Ancient Greek: ἀρετή, aretē) can be taught, acquired by practice, or comes by nature. [2]
(Plato, Apology 22d, translated by Harold North Fowler, 1966). [1] It is also sometimes called the Socratic paradox, although this name is often instead used to refer to other seemingly paradoxical claims made by Socrates in Plato's dialogues (most notably, Socratic intellectualism and the Socratic fallacy). [2]
On Ideas: Aristotle's Criticism of Plato's Theory of Forms (OUP, 1993) Plato on Knowledge and Forms: Selected Essays (OUP, 2003) The Possibility of Inquiry: Meno's Paradox from Socrates to Sextus (OUP, 2014). as editor: The Oxford Handbook of Plato (OUP, 2008) Plato 1 and 2 for the Oxford Readings in Philosophy series (1999).
The concept posits the claim that learning involves the act of rediscovering knowledge from within oneself. This stands in contrast to the opposing doctrine known as empiricism, which posits that all knowledge is derived from experience and sensory perception. Plato develops the theory of anamnesis in his Socratic dialogues: Meno, Phaedo, and ...
Plato's problem describes the disparity between input (poverty of the stimulus) and output (grammar). As Plato suggests in the Meno dialogue, the bridge between input (whether limited or lacking) and output is innate knowledge. Poverty of the stimulus is crucial to the Platonic argument and it is a linchpin concept in Chomskyan linguistics.
Polanyi's paradox, named in honour of the British-Hungarian philosopher Michael Polanyi, is the theory that human knowledge of how the world functions and of our own capability are, to a large extent, beyond our explicit understanding.
[1] [2] Diogenes Laërtius, citing Favorinus, says that Zeno's teacher Parmenides was the first to introduce the paradox of Achilles and the tortoise. But in a later passage, Laërtius attributes the origin of the paradox to Zeno, explaining that Favorinus disagrees. [3] Modern academics attribute the paradox to Zeno. [1] [2]
'Escaping One's Own Notice Knowing: Meno's Paradox Again' (2009), in Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. Vol. 109, 1, pp. 233–256 Vol. 109, 1, pp. 233–256 'The Stoic Sage in the Original Position' (2013), in Politeia in Greek and Roman Philosophy , ed. Verity Harte and Melissa Lane , pp. 251–274
Ad
related to: plato meno knowledge paradox bookebay.com has been visited by 1M+ users in the past month