enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. O'Connor v. Ortega - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/O'Connor_v._Ortega

    O'Connor v. Ortega, 480 U.S. 709 (1987), is a United States Supreme Court decision on the Fourth Amendment rights of government employees with regard to administrative searches in the workplace, during investigations by supervisors for violations of employee policy rather than by law enforcement for criminal offenses.

  3. Reasonable expectation of privacy (United States) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reasonable_expectation_of...

    The Fourth Amendment may not protect informational privacy. Relevant exceptions to the Fourth Amendment's warrant requirement include "1) when consent to search has been given (Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 1973), (2) when the information has been disclosed to a third party (United States v.

  4. City of Ontario v. Quon - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_of_Ontario_v._Quon

    In a concurring opinion, Antonin Scalia rejected the plurality analysis, saying instead that "government searches to retrieve work-related materials or to investigate violations of workplace rules — searches of the sort that are regarded as reasonable and normal in the private employer context — do not violate the Fourth Amendment". [12]

  5. Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_Amendment_to_the...

    The Bill of Rights in the National Archives. The Fourth Amendment (Amendment IV) to the United States Constitution is part of the Bill of Rights.It prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures and sets requirements for issuing warrants: warrants must be issued by a judge or magistrate, justified by probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and must particularly describe the place to be ...

  6. Weeks v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weeks_v._United_States

    Weeks v. United States, 232 U.S. 383 (1914) was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court unanimously held that the warrantless seizure of items from a private residence constitutes a violation of the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. [1]

  7. 4th amendment, religious freedom key arguments in ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/4th-amendment-religious-freedom-key...

    Fourth Amendment rights and religious freedom were key arguments in the legal battle between the Texas AG and El Paso's Annunciation House.

  8. Third-party doctrine - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third-party_doctrine

    Followed by the states in 1791, the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution was enacted in 1792, holding: . The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place ...

  9. Court: Chalked tires violate Fourth Amendment

    www.aol.com/news/drop-chalk-michigan-motorist...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us