Ad
related to: forcible entry and detainer wyoming
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Forcible entry training using a Halligan bar. Forcible entry is "the unlawful taking of possession of real property by force or threats of force or unlawful entry into or onto another's property, especially when accompanied by force". [1] The term is also sometimes used for entry by military, police, or emergency personnel, also called breaching.
Landlord self-help remedies are evictions where "the landlord takes active steps to remove the tenant from the property without initiating legal action." Self-help remedies have been limited by forcible entry and detainer (FED) statutes. [25] Most states have prohibited self-help eviction.
The Forcible Entry Act 1429 (8 Hen. 6.c. 9) was an Act of the Parliament of the Kingdom of England.It is written in the Anglo-Norman language.It was expressed to be passed because the Forcible Entry Act 1391 was felt to be inadequate because it did not apply to persons committing forcible detainer after a peaceful entry or to persons who, having committed forcible detainer, had been expelled ...
Depending on the laws of the jurisdiction, eviction may also be known as unlawful detainer, summary possession, summary dispossess, summary process, forcible detainer, ejectment, and repossession, among other terms. Nevertheless, the term eviction is the most commonly used in communications between the landlord and tenant.
It also authorised any justice of the peace, who had received a complaint that such a forcible entry had been committed, to take the power of the county to arrest any person found committing forcible detainer after that forcible entry. The whole Chapter was repealed [3] for England and Wales [4] on 1 December 1977. [5]
The Forcible Entry Act 1381 (5 Ric. 2 Stat. 1. c. 7) The Forcible Entry Act 1391 (15 Ric. 2. c. 2) The Forcible Entry Act 1429 (8 Hen. 6. c. 9) The Forcible Entry Act 1588 (31 Eliz. 1. c. 11) The Forcible Entry Act 1623 (21 Jas. 1. c. 15) Act of the Parliament of Ireland. The Forcible Entry Act 1786 (26 Geo. 3. c.
The "polestar" of regulatory takings jurisprudence is Penn Central Transp. Co. v.New York City (1973). [3] In Penn Central, the Court denied a takings claim brought by the owner of Grand Central Terminal following refusal of the New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission to approve plans for construction of 50-story office building over Grand Central Terminal.
The United States District Court for the District of Wyoming (in case citations, D. Wyo.) is the federal district court whose jurisdiction comprises the state of Wyoming and those portions of Yellowstone National Park situated in Montana and Idaho; [1] it is the only federal court district that includes portions of more than one state, creating a possible "Zone of Death" where it would be ...
Ad
related to: forcible entry and detainer wyoming