Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Consider a system of n linear equations for n unknowns, represented in matrix multiplication form as follows: = where the n × n matrix A has a nonzero determinant, and the vector = (, …,) is the column vector of the variables. Then the theorem states that in this case the system has a unique solution, whose individual values for the unknowns ...
By the Rouché–Capelli theorem, the system of equations is inconsistent, meaning it has no solutions, if the rank of the augmented matrix (the coefficient matrix augmented with an additional column consisting of the vector b) is greater than the rank of the coefficient matrix. If, on the other hand, the ranks of these two matrices are equal ...
Indeed, multiplying each equation of the second auxiliary system by , adding with the corresponding equation of the first auxiliary system and using the representation = +, we immediately see that equations number 2 through n of the original system are satisfied; it only remains to satisfy equation number 1.
We have the following possible cases for an overdetermined system with N unknowns and M equations (M>N). M = N+1 and all M equations are linearly independent. This case yields no solution. Example: x = 1, x = 2. M > N but only K equations (K < M and K ≤ N+1) are linearly independent. There exist three possible sub-cases of this:
For example, to solve a system of n equations for n unknowns by performing row operations on the matrix until it is in echelon form, and then solving for each unknown in reverse order, requires n(n + 1)/2 divisions, (2n 3 + 3n 2 − 5n)/6 multiplications, and (2n 3 + 3n 2 − 5n)/6 subtractions, [10] for a total of approximately 2n 3 /3 operations.
Substitute this expression into the remaining equations. This yields a system of equations with one fewer equation and unknown. Repeat steps 1 and 2 until the system is reduced to a single linear equation. Solve this equation, and then back-substitute until the entire solution is found. For example, consider the following system:
The unique pair of values a, b satisfying the first two equations is (a, b) = (1, 1); since these values also satisfy the third equation, there do in fact exist a, b such that a times the original first equation plus b times the original second equation equals the original third equation; we conclude that the third equation is linearly ...
For a system of linear equations, the number of equations in an indeterminate system could be the same as the number of unknowns, less than the number of unknowns (an underdetermined system), or greater than the number of unknowns (an overdetermined system). Conversely, any of those three cases may or may not be indeterminate.