Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Padilla v. Commonwealth of Kentucky , 559 U.S. 356 (2010), is a case in which the United States Supreme Court decided that criminal defense attorneys must advise noncitizen clients about the deportation risks of a guilty plea .
Case name and citation Argued Decided Roberts Stevens Scalia Kennedy Thomas Ginsburg ... Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356: October 13, 2009: March 31, 2010: 38
Case name Citation Date decided Hemi Group, LLC v. City of New York: 559 U.S. 1: 2010: Briscoe v. Virginia: 559 U.S. 32: 2010: Wilkins v. Gaddy: 559 U.S. 34
In all jurisdictions throughout the U.S., judges are not obligated to warn of these collateral consequences upon a finding of guilt by trial, or prior to an admission of guilt by plea agreement, except as regards deportation. Deportation has been made an exception by the Supreme Court in Padilla v. Commonwealth of Kentucky. [27]
Padilla (surname) Padilla v. Kentucky, a United States Supreme Court case pertaining to the immigration consequences faced by lawful permanent residents who are convicted of crimes, and their rights to be warned of those consequences
Ohio State offensive coordinator Chip Kelly watches warm-ups before the game against Indiana on Nov. 23, 2024. He is among USA TODAY Sports' most overpaid college football assistant coaches.
Chaidez v. United States, 568 U.S. 342 (2013), was a United States Supreme Court case that determined that the ruling in Padilla v. Commonwealth of Kentucky could not be applied retroactively, because the Padilla case applied a new rule to the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution. [1]
Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!