Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
A possible null hypothesis is that the mean male score is the same as the mean female score: H 0: μ 1 = μ 2. where H 0 = the null hypothesis, μ 1 = the mean of population 1, and μ 2 = the mean of population 2. A stronger null hypothesis is that the two samples have equal variances and shapes of their respective distributions.
The null hypothesis is that the subject has no ability to distinguish the teas. In Fisher's approach, there was no alternative hypothesis , [ 2 ] unlike in the Neyman–Pearson approach . The test statistic is a simple count of the number of successful attempts to select the four cups prepared by a given method.
Thus, the null hypothesis is rejected if >, (where , is the upper tail critical value for the distribution). Bartlett's test is a modification of the corresponding likelihood ratio test designed to make the approximation to the χ k − 1 2 {\displaystyle \chi _{k-1}^{2}} distribution better (Bartlett, 1937).
Then the null hypothesis of no Granger causality is not rejected if and only if no lagged values of an explanatory variable have been retained in the regression. In practice it may be found that neither variable Granger-causes the other, or that each of the two variables Granger-causes the other.
Equivalence tests are a variety of hypothesis tests used to draw statistical inferences from observed data. In these tests, the null hypothesis is defined as an effect large enough to be deemed interesting, specified by an equivalence bound. The alternative hypothesis is any effect that is less extreme than said equivalence bound.
Null distribution is a tool scientists often use when conducting experiments. The null distribution is the distribution of two sets of data under a null hypothesis. If the results of the two sets of data are not outside the parameters of the expected results, then the null hypothesis is said to be true. Null and alternative distribution
The Shapiro–Wilk test tests the null hypothesis that a sample x 1, ..., x n came from a normally distributed population. The test statistic is = (= ()) = (¯), where with parentheses enclosing the subscript index i is the ith order statistic, i.e., the ith-smallest number in the sample (not to be confused with ).
The null hypothesis is that there is no serial correlation of any order up to p. [3] Because the test is based on the idea of Lagrange multiplier testing, it is sometimes referred to as an LM test for serial correlation. [4] A similar assessment can be also carried out with the Durbin–Watson test and the Ljung–Box test.