enow.com Web Search

Search results

1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network

2. Unlocking Consumer Choice and Wireless Competition Act

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unlocking_Consumer_Choice...

   As a result, only phones that were purchased before or within 90 days of the effective date could continue to be unlocked by users. Phones purchased more than 90 days past the effective date would again be subject to the anti-circumvention clause of the DMCA and could not be legally unlocked without the carrier's permission. [4] [1]

3. Casetify - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casetify

   Casetify later released a statement that they are investigating on the allegations and mentioned that the cause of the downtime was a DDOS attack. [33] [34] On the following day, Casetify was accused of stealing x-ray images of the iPhone X from iFixit's design and using it on their "X-Ray Case" line of items. [35] [36]

4. CASETiFY's just made a phone case you'll never get bored with

   www.aol.com/casetify-phone-case-mix-and-match...

   CASETiFY's new Push-In Case has the same viral, personalized vibe as Crocs, but even better. Finally, there's a phone case you'll never get bored of using! CASETiFY's new Push-In Case has the same ...

5. These protective 'desert neutral' cases eliminate 99 percent ...

   www.aol.com/entertainment/casetify-desert...

   This Casetify collection includes matte, neutral-toned phone cases that are sleek and fashion-forward, all while fully protecting your device. These protective 'desert neutral' cases eliminate 99 ...

6. Smartphone patent wars - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smartphone_patent_wars

   The pattern of suing and countersuing really began in 2009 as growth in the demand for smartphones accelerated dramatically with the advent of the modern smartphone, which combined a responsive touch screen with a modern multi-tasking operating system, a browser that provided full web access and an application store, in the form of the Apple iPhone 3G and the first Android phones.

7. Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_Inc._v._Samsung...

   Apple sued Samsung in 2011, alleging in a 38-page complaint with the United States District Court for the Northern District of California that several of Samsung's Android phones and tablets, infringed on Apple's intellectual property: its patents, trademarks, user interface and style. [14]