Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Changing one controversial title to another without a discussion that leads to consensus is strongly discouraged. If an article title has been stable for a long time, [j] and there is no good reason to change it, it should not be changed. Consensus among editors determines if there does exist a good reason to change the title.
Articles on this list should be checked from time to time to monitor developments in the presentation of the issues. Use the "related changes" link to quickly review changes to these articles. Discussions about those controversies should be limited to the relevant Talk pages. For more information, see Wikipedia:Controversial articles.
Important content that drifts outside of that limit should be moved to appropriate other articles and linked to or the current article should be retitled. The lead does not define the limits of the article; if the lead is more limiting than the title, add the content to the body and rewrite the lead to summarize the body more accurately.
Contentious topic restrictions are authorized for all pages related to the English Wikipedia Manual of Style and article titles policy, broadly construed. The scope of this remedy refers to discussions about the policies and guidelines mentioned, and does not extend to individual move requests , move reviews , article talk pages, or other ...
Controversial content can survive a severe dispute if you adhere closely to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. You want to add a controversial fact or allegation into Wikipedia or create a new article about a controversial issue, but it will probably be deleted. You want it to survive, so the world will finally know.
The following guidelines apply to Wikipedia article titles for events and incidents, such as military and political conflicts, natural disasters, terrorist attacks, transportation and industrial accidents, health outbreaks, and the like. This guideline complements the WP:Article titles policy and should be read and understood that way. In the ...
Who are 'Moms for Liberty' and why is the group so controversial? Marquise Francis. May 10, 2023 at 7:12 AM. ... In all, 2,571 titles were targeted for censorship in 2022, a 38% increase on the ...
The journal was established in November 2018 by academic moral philosophers Francesca Minerva, Jeff McMahan, and Peter Singer. [1] [4] It began accepting submissions in April 2020, [5] looking for "careful, rigorous, unpolemical discussion of issues that are widely considered controversial, in the sense that certain views about them might be regarded by many people as morally, socially, or ...