Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Administering one form of the test to a group of individuals. At some later time, administering an alternate form of the same test to the same group of people. Correlating scores on form A with scores on form B. The correlation between scores on the two alternate forms is used to estimate the reliability of the test.
Criteria for evaluating reliability. The reliability of Wikipedia articles can be measured by the following criteria: Vandalism of a Wikipedia article. The section on the left is the normal, undamaged version; and on the right is the vandalized, damaged version. Accuracy of information provided within articles.
The following presents a non-exhaustive list of sources whose reliability and use on Wikipedia are frequently discussed. This list summarizes prior consensus and consolidates links to the most in-depth and recent discussions from the reliable sources noticeboard and elsewhere on Wikipedia.
Reliability (statistics), the overall consistency of a measure. Reliability engineering, concerned with the ability of a system or component to perform its required functions under stated conditions for a specified time. High reliability is informally reported in "nines". Human reliability in engineered systems.
Congeneric reliability applies to datasets of vectors: each row X in the dataset is a list Xi of numerical scores corresponding to one individual. The congeneric model supposes that there is a single underlying property ("factor") of the individual F, such that each numerical score Xi is a noisy measurement of F.
A typical statistics course covers descriptive statistics, probability, binomial and normal distributions, test of hypotheses and confidence intervals, linear regression, and correlation. [66] Modern fundamental statistical courses for undergraduate students focus on correct test selection, results interpretation, and use of free statistics ...
Overview. Source reliability falls on a spectrum: No source is 'always reliable' or 'always unreliable' for everything. However, some sources provide stronger or weaker support for a given statement. Editors must use their judgment to draw the line between usable and inappropriate sources for each statement.
In statistics, inter-rater reliability (also called by various similar names, such as inter-rater agreement, inter-rater concordance, inter-observer reliability, inter-coder reliability, and so on) is the degree of agreement among independent observers who rate, code, or assess the same phenomenon. Assessment tools that rely on ratings must ...