Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In the formal speech competition genre known as policy debate, a widely accepted doctrine or "debate theory" divides the argument elements of supporting the resolution affirmative into five subtopical issues, called the stock issues. Stock issues are sometime referred to as on-case arguments or simply on-case or case arguments as opposed off ...
Policy debate – Form of competitive debate Stock issues – Five subtopical issues in policy debate; Presumption – In law, an inference of a particular fact; Public sphere – Area in social life with political ramifications; Rationality – Quality of being agreeable to reason; Rhetoric – Art of persuasion
In competitive debate, an advantage is the way that the affirmative team refers to the positive consequences of adopting their position on the debate resolution.It is an argument structure that seeks to convince the judge that the affirmative plan, if adopted, would result in a net-beneficial improvement to the status quo.
Here's what else happened today: 'Don't buy the tech dip' as the market gets more volatile , BofA says. 5 markets hit hardest by housing shrinkflation , according to Realtor.com .
The stock has fallen more than 50% since mid-July, ... In this combination photo, Kamala Harris speaks during a debate, Oct. 7, 2020, in Salt Lake City, left, and former President Donald Trump ...
If both the advertisement made 40 years ago and the exact same advertisement made today contain the same speaker with the same credentials (ethos), and the same arguments with the same logic (logos), and they both appeal to the same emotions and the same values (pathos), but the reception is completely different, then what has changed is the ...
The share price of Trump Media plunged more than 10% on Wednesday, a day after majority shareholder Donald Trump gave a widely panned presidential debate performance against Vice President Kamala ...
Anatol Rapoport's 1960 book Fights, Games, and Debates described three persuasive strategies that could be applied in debates. [11] He noted that they correspond to three kinds of psychotherapy or ways of changing people, [12] and he named them after Pavlov (behaviorism), Freud (psychoanalysis), and Rogers (person-centered therapy).