Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Format links to a number of common caselaw sources Template parameters [Edit template data] Parameter Description Type Status Case case name of legal case, possibly including wikitext citation Example ''Brown v. Board of Education'', {{ussc|347|483|1954|el=no}} String required Cornell LII link cornell URL on Legal Information Institute at Cornell Law School Example https://www.law.cornell.edu ...
Summary judgment granted, 143 F. Supp. 3d 609 (E.D. Mich. 2015); aff'd in part, 854 F. 3d 877 (6th Cir. 2017) Full text of the opinion: official slip opinion · Justia
2017 term per curiam opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States#Kisela v. Hughes; Retrieved from " ...
United States Reports, the official reporter of the Supreme Court of the United States. Case citation is a system used by legal professionals to identify past court case decisions, either in series of books called reporters or law reports, or in a neutral style that identifies a decision regardless of where it is reported.
This is a list of all the United States Supreme Court cases from volume 584 of the United States Reports: . Note: As of August 2024, final bound volumes for the U.S. Supreme Court's United States Reports have been published through volume 579.
Fulton v. City of Philadelphia , 593 U.S. 522 (2021), was a United States Supreme Court case which held that the City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania violated First Amendment rights of a Catholic foster care agency by refusing to renew the agency's contract unless it agreed to certify married same-sex couples as foster parents.
On April 30, 2007, the Supreme Court unanimously reversed the judgment of the Federal Circuit, holding that the disputed claim 4 of the patent was obvious under the requirements of 35 U.S.C. §103, and that in "rejecting the District Court’s rulings, the Court of Appeals analyzed the issue in a narrow, rigid manner inconsistent with §103 and our precedents," referring to the Federal Circuit ...
Stern v. Marshall, 564 U.S. 462 (2011), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a bankruptcy court, as a non-Article III court (i.e. courts without full judicial independence) lacked constitutional authority under Article III of the United States Constitution to enter a final judgment on a state law counterclaim that is not resolved in the process of ruling on a ...