Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Williams v. Illinois, 567 U.S. 50 (2012) was a United States Supreme Court case where it was ruled that having an expert witness testify on behalf of a third-party lab analyst does not violate the Sixth Amendment's Confrontation Clause as long as the results were not directed to prove guilt.
Case name Citation Date decided Elgin v. Dept. of Treasury: 567 U.S. 1: 2012: Parker v. Matthews: 567 U.S. 37: 2012: Williams v. Illinois: 567 U.S. 50: 2012 ...
Justice Appointment history Agreement with judgment Opinions filed Seniority Name President Date confirmed % # Total Chief Justice: John Roberts: George W. Bush
Case name Citation Date decided Coleman v. Alabama: 399 U.S. 1: 1970: Vale v. Louisiana: 399 U.S. 30: 1970: Chambers v. Maroney: 399 U.S. 42: 1970: Baldwin v. New York
Williams v. Illinois, 399 U.S. 235 (1970), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that, if a person cannot afford to pay a fine, it violates the Equal Protection Clause to convert that unpaid fine into jail time to extend a person's incarceration beyond a statutory maximum length.
Case name Citation Date decided Shalala v. Illinois Council on Long Term Care, Inc. 529 U.S. 1: 2000: United States v. Johnson: 529 U.S. 53: 2000: Portuondo v.
Withrow v. Williams: 235 Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois: 236 Ex parte Grossman: 237 Scribner v. Straus: 238 First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. Los Angeles County: 239 Inter-Island Steam Navigation Co. v. Ward: 240 Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Stevic: 241 Anderson County Commissioners v. Beal: 242 Nguyen v. INS: 243 ...
567 u.s. 260 (2012) Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986 • Fair Sentencing Act • mandatory minimum setencing • applicability of post-Act sentencing to pre-Act offenders Kennedy, Ginsburg, Sotomayor, Kagan