Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The Sir Samuel Way Building, housing the District Court of South Australia, as viewed from Victoria Square. Mr Craig was charged with offences in the District Court of South Australia. The maximum penalty for each charge was five years or more. [4] As he lacked counsel, Craig made a Dietrich application. [Note 1] He succeeded. Judge Russell ...
Aboriginal Sentencing Court; Coroner's Court of South Australia; District Court of South Australia; Environment, Resources and Development Court; Licensing Court of South Australia; Magistrates Court of South Australia; Supreme Court of South Australia; South Australian Civil and Administrative Tribunal; South Australian Employment Court
The District Court of South Australia is South Australia's principal trial court. It was established as a court of record by the District Court Act 1991 . Prior to that the Court had existed since 1969 under the Local and District Criminal Courts Act 1926 .
The Magistrates Court of South Australia is the lowest level court in the state of South Australia. The Magistrates Court, then known as the Court of Petty Sessions, was established in 1837, by the Court of Sessions Act 1837. [1] It has both original and appellate jurisdiction and hears matters specified in the Magistrates Court Act 1991 (SA). [2]
The governor of South Australia, being the representative of the South Australian head of state, the king of Australia, is officially granted a flag for use on all official occasions. It is identical in design and construction to the flag of South Australia, except that it features a St. Edward's Crown above the badge to represent vice-regal power.
Selected decisions of the High Court, Federal Court, State and Territory Supreme Courts Australian Company Law Reports: ACLR: 1974-1989 Criminal law: Australian Criminal Reports: A Crim R: 1979-Thomson Reuters: Selected decisions on criminal law by the High Court of Australia, Federal Court of Australia and the Supreme Courts of the states and ...
A giant Confederate flag along Interstate 85 still flies while supporters and opponents battle out its fate in the courts. Spartanburg County waiting on courts to decide fate of Confederate flag ...
Castlemaine Tooheys Ltd v South Australia, [1] is a High Court of Australia case that deals with whether a particular Act of South Australia contravenes Section 92 of the Constitution of Australia, which is about the freedom of interstate trade.