Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The High Court of Delhi (Hindi: दिल्ली उच्च न्यायालय; IAST: dillī uchcha nyāyālaya) is the high court in Delhi, India. It was established on 31 October 1966, through the Delhi High Court Act, 1966. [1] Below it are 11 Subordinate Courts that oversee smaller judicial districts.
Official website Subramonium Prasad (born 22 June 1967) is an Indian Judge currently serving as a Judge of the Delhi High Court since 11 October 2021. [ 1 ] [ 2 ]
The case came up for hearing before a bench comprising Chief Justice Ajit Prakash Shah and Justice S. Muralidhar, and the judgment was delivered on 2 July 2009. [9] The Court located the rights to dignity and privacy within the right to life and liberty guaranteed by Article 21 (under the fundamental Right to Freedom charter) of the Constitution, and held that criminalization of consensual gay ...
Consequently, the court directed local authorities to monitor the petitioner under the provisions of the Mental Health Act. [6] On 14 October 2024, the Delhi High Court bench, comprising Manmohan and Gedela, criticised a Wikipedia page dedicated to the defamation lawsuit filed by Asian News International (ANI) against the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF
[37] [38] In June 2015, the Delhi High Court refused to set aside Meena's appointment but asked him to act in "accordance with law". [39] Consequently, the Delhi government reduced Meena's mandate, asking him to look after training and cases undergoing trial. Yadav was asked to handle—among other things—investigations and functioning of the ...
The Delhi High Court in its 7 December 2015 judgment noted "criminal intent." [41] On 12 February 2016 the Supreme Court granted exemption to all the five accused in the case from personal appearances while refusing to quash proceedings against them. [42] [43] Later on 12 July 2016 the Delhi High Court set aside the trial court judgement ...
Singh passed LL.B. from the Delhi University and started practice before the Supreme Court of India as well as Delhi High Court. She became the Senior Advocate in 2011. Singh worked as advocate on behalf of the Govt. of India. She served as a member of Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee.
The State of Delhi submitted that for these reasons the judgement of the High Court was valid. The Supreme Court felt that the arguments of the State of Delhi and the Delhi High Court judgement had lost sight of an essential feature of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, contained in Section 7 of the same Act.