enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Janhit Abhiyan v. Union of India - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Janhit_Abhiyan_v._Union_of...

    By adding Articles 15(6) and 16(6) to the Indian Constitution, the state acquired the authority to impose specific restrictions on reservations for economically weaker sections, with a maximum of 10%. The Superem court compiled all the writ under the case Janhit Abhiyan Vs Union of India.

  3. Deepika Singh v. Central Administrative Tribunal - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deepika_Singh_v._Central...

    Court: Supreme Court of India: Full case name: Deepika Singh versus Central Administrative Tribunal & Ors. Decided: 16 August 2022: Citations: C.A. No 5308/2022: Court membership; Judges sitting: D. Y. Chandrachud, J.; and A. S. Bopanna, J. Case opinions; Atypical families are deserving of equal protection under law and benefits available under ...

  4. Supriyo v. Union of India - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supriyo_v._Union_of_India

    Supriyo a.k.a Supriya Chakraborty & Abhay Dang v. Union of India thr. Its Secretary, Ministry of Law and Justice & other connected cases (2023) are a collection of landmark cases of the Supreme Court of India, which were filed to consider whether to extend right to marry and establish a family to sexual and gender minority individuals in India. [4]

  5. 2019 Supreme Court verdict on Ayodhya dispute - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019_Supreme_Court_verdict...

    The final judgement in the Ayodhya dispute was declared by the Supreme Court of India on 9 November 2019. [4] The Supreme Court ordered the disputed land (2.77 acres) to be handed over to a trust (to be created by the government of India) to build the Ram Janmabhoomi (revered as the birthplace of Hindu deity, Rama) temple.

  6. National Legal Services Authority v. Union of India - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Legal_Services...

    National Legal Services Authority v. Union of India (2014) is a landmark judgement of the Supreme Court of India, which declared transgender people the 'third gender', affirmed that the fundamental rights granted under the Constitution of India will be equally applicable to them, and gave them the right to self-identification of their gender as male, female or third gender.

  7. List of landmark court decisions in India - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_landmark_court...

    Three Judges Cases: 1981 S.P. Gupta v. Union of India [37] Established the Collegium system of the Indian Judicial System. 1993 Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association v. Union of India [38] Struck down the 99th Amendment of the Constitution of India and the proposal of the National Judicial Appointments Commission. 1998 In re Special ...

  8. Supreme Court of India - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supreme_Court_of_India

    Initially, the Constitution of India provided for a Supreme Court with a chief justice and 7 judges. In the early years, a full bench of the Supreme Court sat together to hear the cases presented before them. As the work of the Court increased and cases began to accumulate, Parliament increased the number of judges (including the chief justice ...

  9. Puttaswamy v. Union of India - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puttaswamy_v._Union_of_India

    Puttaswamy v. Union of India; Court: Supreme Court of India: Full case name: Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Anr. vs Union Of India And Ors. Decided: August 24, 2017 () Citation: Writ Petition (Civil) No 494 of 2012; (2017) 10 SCC 1; AIR 2017 SC 4161: Case history; Related actions: decriminalization of homosexuality; decriminalization of ...