Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Arizona v. Evans, 514 U.S. 1 (1995), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court instituted an exclusionary rule exception allowing evidence obtained through a warrantless search to be valid when a police record erroneously indicates the existence of an outstanding warrant due to negligent conduct of a Clerk of Court.
Prior to the decision of Arizona v. Evans, Representative Bill McCollum introduced the Exclusionary Rule Reform Act of 1995 to the House of the 104th Congress. The Act would have codified the ruling in United States v. Leon and expanded the good-faith exception to warrantless searches. [18]
Case name Citation Date decided Arizona v. Evans: 514 U.S. 1: 1995: Swint v. Chambers County Comm'n: 514 U.S. 35: 1995: Mastrobuono v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc.
Thus, for example, in Leon itself, the court concluded that the fruits of a search based on a search warrant later found defective should not be excluded because the rule's deterrent purpose "will only rarely be served by applying it in such circumstances," [7] and in Arizona v. Evans, the court concluded that the fruits of a search based on an ...
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us
B. Bailey v. United States (2013) Beck v. Ohio; Bell v. Wolfish; Berger v. New York; Birchfield v. North Dakota; Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents; Board of Education v.
Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!
Arizona Free Enterprise Club's Freedom Club PAC v. Bennett; Arizona Organic Act; Arizona State Legislature v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission; Arizona v. Evans; Arizona v. Fulminante; Arizona v. Hicks; Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, Inc. Arizona v. Johnson; Arizona v. Maricopa County Medical Society; Arizona v. Youngblood