enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Wong Sun v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wong_Sun_v._United_States

    Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471 (1963), is a United States Supreme Court decision excluding the presentation of verbal evidence and recovered narcotics where they were both fruits of an illegal entry. Narcotics agents unlawfully entered Toy's laundry at which point Toy indicated that Jonny was selling narcotics.

  3. Fruit of the poisonous tree - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fruit_of_the_poisonous_tree

    The American doctrine of the fruit of the poisonous tree has generally been rejected by the courts and legislators in Australia. Courts have tended to reject evidence where there is serious risk of unreliability, but where evidence is obtained unlawfully or improperly, the interest in deterring the police from unlawful, improper, or unfair treatment of the accused is balanced against the ...

  4. United States v. Wong Kim Ark - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Wong_Kim_Ark

    United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898), was a landmark decision [2] of the U.S. Supreme Court which held that "a child born in the United States, of parents of Chinese descent, who, at the time of his birth, are subjects of the Emperor of China, but have a permanent domicile and residence in the United States, and are there carrying on business, and are not employed in any ...

  5. List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Warren Court

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    United States v. Harriss: 347 U.S. 612 (1954) constitutionality of The Federal Regulation of Lobbying Act of 1946: Berman v. Parker: 348 U.S. 26 (1954) eminent domain, takings United States v. International Boxing Club of New York: Antitrust: 348 U.S. 236 (1955) boxing not exempt from antitrust regulation Tee-Hit-Ton Indians v. United States ...

  6. Talk:Wong Sun v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Wong_Sun_v._United_States

    (details of James Wah Toy and Wong Sun's connection, investigation of Hom Way, possibly brief discussion of the rise of the heroin trade in SF Chinatown per 17 Mich. J. Race & L. 159, 167, and discussion of arrest and the unsigned statements) Trial court (details of the first trial and convictions) Appeal

  7. Exclusionary rule - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exclusionary_rule

    Suppression of evidence, however, has always been our last resort, not our first impulse. The exclusionary rule generates "substantial social costs," United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897, 907 (1984), which sometimes include setting the guilty free and the dangerous at large. We have therefore been "cautious against expanding" it, Colorado v

  8. Singapore charges two ex-employees of Sembcorp Marine in ...

    www.aol.com/news/singapore-charges-two-ex...

    800-290-4726 more ways to reach us. Sign in. ... Former CEO Wong Weng Sun and ex-manager Lee Fook Kang face five charges of conspiring to offer a middleman inducements to aid Sembcorp Marine's ...

  9. Wong Wing v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wong_Wing_v._United_States

    Wong Wing v. United States, 163 U.S. 228 (1896), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court found that the Fifth and Sixth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution forbid the imprisonment at hard labor without a jury trial for noncitizens convicted of illegal entry to or presence in the United States.