enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. To recuse or refuse? A look at Supreme Court justices ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/recuse-refuse-look-supreme...

    In declining to step aside from two high-profile Supreme Court cases, Justice Samuel Alito on Wednesday provided a rare window on the opaque process by which justices decide to step aside from cases.

  3. Recusal - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recusal

    The term "recuse" originates from the Latin word "recusare," meaning "to demur," or "object" reflecting the fundamental principle of rejecting participation when impartiality is in doubt. [3] The word "recuse" traces its origins to the Anglo-French term "recuser," meaning "to refuse," which itself comes from the Middle French and Latin "recusare."

  4. Clarence Thomas Has Recused Himself Before. Will He Do ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/clarence-thomas-recused-himself...

    The letter also highlighted how the Court’s new code of conduct calls for Justices to recuse themselves if their spouse has “interest that could be substantially affected by the outcome of the ...

  5. US judge declines to recuse from case against man ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/us-judge-declines-recuse-case...

    A U.S. judge on Tuesday declined to recuse herself from presiding over the criminal case against a man who is facing charges for trying to assassinate former president and Republican presidential ...

  6. Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caperton_v._A.T._Massey...

    Caperton v. A. T. Massey Coal Co., 556 U.S. 868 (2009), is a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment requires judges to recuse themselves not only when actual bias has been demonstrated or when the judge has an economic interest in the outcome of the case but also when "extreme facts" create a "probability of bias."

  7. Laird v. Tatum - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laird_v._Tatum

    Laird v. Tatum, 408 U.S. 1 (1972), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court dismissed for lack of ripeness a claim in which the plaintiff accused the U.S. Army of alleged unlawful "surveillance of lawful citizen's political activity."

  8. Jeff Sessions explains why he recused himself from Trump ...

    www.aol.com/article/news/2017/06/13/jeff...

    Attorney General Jeff Sessions gave widely anticipated testimony in front of the Senate Intelligence Committee on Tuesday afternoon.

  9. Nevada Commission on Ethics v. Carrigan - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nevada_Commission_on...

    Nevada Commission on Ethics v. Carrigan, 564 U.S. 117 (2011), was a Supreme Court of the United States decision in which the court held that the Nevada Ethics in Government Law, which required government officials recuse in cases involving a conflict of interest, is not unconstitutionally overbroad. Specifically, the law requires government ...