Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Charleton J. stated that the Act of 1997 doesn't take away the High Court's full and original authority in bail cases. It also doesn't take away the court's authority in the trial of the crime charged." The main purpose of the statute is to introduce and process the new reason for refusing bail. In some places, it also amends the common law on ...
Bail can be granted by any of the courts of Scotland, with the final decision in solemn proceedings being with the High Court of Justiciary. All crimes are bailable, and bail should be granted to any accused person "except where there is good reason for refusing bail".
The reason for such disparity is that different judges may assign different weights to factors such as flight risk or community ties. [82] This is an oft cited reason as to why bail reform is necessary, as ambiguity in the bail decision-making process may lead to unfair and disparate outcomes.
British colonizers instituted the practice in the United States for the same reason, but during the nationwide panic over law and order in the 1980s, bail became used as a way to detain people out ...
The Eighth Amendment was adopted, as part of the Bill of Rights, in 1791.It is almost identical to a provision in the English Bill of Rights of 1689, in which Parliament declared, "as their ancestors in like cases have usually done ... that excessive bail ought not to be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted."
Refusing or neglecting to obey a subpoena; Willfully disobeying a process or order of the court; Interfering with the orderly administration of justice or impairing the authority or dignity of the court; Failing to perform duties as an officer of the court; A sheriff or bailiff not executing a writ of the court forthwith or not making a return ...
The Bail Reform Act of 1966, one of the first significant pieces of the federal bail legislation, made "willfully fail[ing] to appear before any court or judicial officer as required" punishable by up to five years in prison and a $5,000 fine. [12] In 1984, Congress increased the sanctions for FTAs in federal court. [13]
Civil disobedience is the active and professed refusal of a citizen to obey certain laws, demands, orders, or commands of a government (or any other authority). By some definitions, civil disobedience has to be nonviolent to be called "civil".