Ad
related to: alternatives to the end behavior of quadratic equations
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The chakravala method (Sanskrit: चक्रवाल विधि) is a cyclic algorithm to solve indeterminate quadratic equations, including Pell's equation.It is commonly attributed to Bhāskara II, (c. 1114 – 1185 CE) [1] [2] although some attribute it to Jayadeva (c. 950 ~ 1000 CE). [3]
Quadratic eigenvalue problems arise naturally in the solution of systems of second order linear differential equations without forcing: ″ + ′ + = Where (), and ,,.If all quadratic eigenvalues of () = + + are distinct, then the solution can be written in terms of the quadratic eigenvalues and right quadratic eigenvectors as
The conjugate gradient method can be applied to an arbitrary n-by-m matrix by applying it to normal equations A T A and right-hand side vector A T b, since A T A is a symmetric positive-semidefinite matrix for any A. The result is conjugate gradient on the normal equations (CGN or CGNR). A T Ax = A T b
Modern improvements on Brent's method include Chandrupatla's method, which is simpler and faster for functions that are flat around their roots; [3] [4] Ridders' method, which performs exponential interpolations instead of quadratic providing a simpler closed formula for the iterations; and the ITP method which is a hybrid between regula-falsi ...
If we use a polynomial fit to remove the quadratic part of the finite difference used in the secant method, so that it better approximates the derivative, we obtain Steffensen's method, which has quadratic convergence, and whose behavior (both good and bad) is essentially the same as Newton's method but does not require a derivative.
Ritz–Galerkin method (after Walther Ritz) typically assumes symmetric and positive definite bilinear form in the weak formulation, where the differential equation for a physical system can be formulated via minimization of a quadratic function representing the system energy and the approximate solution is a linear combination of the given set ...
The above matrix equations explain the behavior of polynomial regression well. However, to physically implement polynomial regression for a set of xy point pairs, more detail is useful. The below matrix equations for polynomial coefficients are expanded from regression theory without derivation and easily implemented. [6] [7] [8]
The geometric interpretation of Newton's method is that at each iteration, it amounts to the fitting of a parabola to the graph of () at the trial value , having the same slope and curvature as the graph at that point, and then proceeding to the maximum or minimum of that parabola (in higher dimensions, this may also be a saddle point), see below.
Ad
related to: alternatives to the end behavior of quadratic equations