enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Gross negligence - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gross_negligence

    Gross negligence is used as a standard for criminal law, for example, under manslaughter in English law. [4] Under common law, criminal negligence is defined as a gross deviation from a reasonable standard of care. This is a higher standard than ordinary negligence under tort law.

  3. Legal liability of certified public accountants - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_liability_of...

    Professional negligence: Negligence may be viewed as “failure to exercise due professional care". [2] Both clients and third parties can sue CPAs for the tort of negligence, which is a wrongful act, injury, or damage for which a civil action can be brought. Negligence can be referred to as ordinary negligence and gross negligence.

  4. Personal injury - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_injury

    Depending upon the intent or negligence of a responsible party, the injured party may be entitled to monetary compensation from that party through a settlement or a judgment. Although personal injury cases may result from an intentional act, such as defamation, or from reckless conduct, most personal injury claims are based on a theory of ...

  5. The surgeon’s license of Hanford physician David Wayne Nelson is to be revoked by the California Medical Board after the board determined Nelson was guilty of gross negligence by performing a ...

  6. Negligence - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negligence

    Negligence (Lat. negligentia) [1] is a failure to exercise appropriate care expected to be exercised in similar circumstances. [2]Within the scope of tort law, negligence pertains to harm caused by the violation of a duty of care through a negligent act or failure to act.

  7. Negligent infliction of emotional distress - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negligent_infliction_of...

    Legg, the Supreme Court of California was the first court to allow recovery for emotional distress alone – even in the absence of any physical injury to the plaintiff – in the particular situation where the plaintiff simply witnessed the death of a close relative at a distance, and was not within the "zone of danger" where the relative was ...

  8. Dillon v. Legg - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dillon_v._Legg

    Dillon v. Legg, 68 Cal. 2d 728 (1968), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of California that established the tort of negligent infliction of emotional distress.To date, it is the most persuasive decision of the most persuasive state supreme court in the United States during the latter half of the 20th century: Dillon has been favorably cited and followed by at least twenty reported out-of ...

  9. ‘The definition of poaching’: Conspiracy alleged after group ...

    www.aol.com/definition-poaching-conspiracy...

    This is the type of activity that’s well within the definition of poaching,” said Patrick Foy, captain of the California Fish and Wildlife Department’s legal division.