Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Creative Commons license symbol for attribution. Attribution, in copyright law, is acknowledgment as credit to the copyright holder or author of a work. If a work is under copyright, there is a long tradition of the author requiring attribution while directly quoting portions of work created by that author. [1] [2]
The author, or the licensor in case the author did a contractual transfer of rights, needs to have the exclusive rights on the work. If the work has already been published under a public license, it can be uploaded by any third party, once more on another platform, by using a compatible license, and making reference and attribution to the original license (e.g. by referring to the URL of the ...
This is an accepted version of this page This is the latest accepted revision, reviewed on 23 January 2025. Organization creating copyright licenses for the public release of creative works This article is about the organization. For their eponymous licenses, see Creative Commons license. For usage of product, see List of major Creative Commons licensed works. Creative Commons Creative Commons ...
As with all six licenses in the current Creative Commons suite, CC Attribution-ShareAlike and CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike require attribution.According to Creative Commons, the advantage of this license is that future users are not able to add new restrictions to a derivative of your work; their derivatives must be licensed the same way.
An examination of media use in biodiversity research publications reported that people both offering and reusing biodiversity media with the noncommercial license have a variety of conflicting understandings about what this should mean. [6] Erik Möller raised concerns about the use of Creative Commons' non-commercial license. Works distributed ...
Some free software licences, including the GNU General Public License (GPL) and European Union Public Licence (EUPL), can also be used to license content other than software. However, the FSF has recommended against using the GPL for educational works. [2]
→ version available only under the CC BY-SA license, unless Candice's edit was so trivial that copyright would not attach (e.g., fixing a typo) Boris makes an edit. → version available only under the CC BY-SA license, unless Candice's edit can be separated from the rest of the article (e.g., by removing a paragraph).
The 1.0 and 1.1 versions were published in English and translated into several languages. [6] The Definition of Free Cultural Works is used by the Wikimedia Foundation. [7] In 2008, the Attribution and Attribution-ShareAlike Creative Commons licenses were marked as "Approved for Free Cultural Works". [8]