Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd v State Rail Authority of New South Wales, [1] ("Codelfa") is a widely cited Australian contract law case, [2] which serves as authority for the modern approach to contractual construction. [3] The case greatly influenced the development of the Eastern Suburbs railway line.
Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd v State Rail Authority of NSW is a pre-eminent case in Australian law of frustration of a contract, applying a tripartite test, namely, an obligation under the contract is incapable of being performed, without fault of either of the parties (e.g., the parties didn't cause the frustrating event to occur), because the ...
In Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd v State Rail Authority of NSW, implication of a term in fact in a contract, by reference to what is necessary to give it business efficacy, was described as raising issues "as to the meaning and effect of the contract". Implication is not "an orthodox exercise in the interpretation of the language of a contract ...
Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd v State Rail Authority of New South Wales: 1982 149 CLR 337; [1982] HCA 24 Gibbs: 3748 Contract: Construction of contracts 20. Aon Risk Services Australia Ltd v Australian National University: 2009 258 ALR 14; [2009] HCA 27 French: 3726 21. Abebe v Commonwealth: 1999 197 CLR 510; [1999] HCA 14 Gleeson: 3425 Refugee ...
See where work is permanently closing roads to traffic for a bullet-train route.
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us
For example, in Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd v State Rail Authority of New South Wales, [15] a term regarding the inability of construction company to work three shifts a day could not be implied because it was unclear what form it would have taken.
East Palestine and Norfolk Southern have announced a $22 million settlement resolving all of the village’s claims arising from the disastrous 2023 train derailment near the Ohio-Pennsylvania ...