Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Wikipedia is a great place to start. Wikipedia is not paper , and that is a good thing because articles are not strictly limited in size as they are with paper encyclopedias. Articles steadily become more polished as they develop, particularly if one person is working on an article with reasonable regularity (inclining others to help the ...
See also why Wikipedia is so great. Learning to write in a neutral point of view is a useful intellectual exercise, since it requires cultivating humility and respect for the views of others. Wikipedia is a remarkable phenomenon of social organization; learning how things work here provides valuable lessons for many other kinds of organizations.
A Wikipedia article bestows upon its subject a certain credibility, and in most cases a far better web presence than even their own website does. So having a Wikipedia article can certainly help an organisation or a new product or a rising rock star to make it. We have a great global presence. And everyone knows this.
Ten things you may not know about Wikipedia is a list of insights about Wikipedia specifically targeted at people who have limited or no prior experience with the project (such as journalists, new editors, and new readers). These explanations should not surprise experienced editors but will hopefully help the rest of the world to shape an ...
The number of Wikipedia articles grew exponentially from October 2002 to October 2006. By 2009, new article growth had become logarithmic. [4]Currently the Wikipedia has over 6,926,315 articles, making it the largest encyclopedia ever assembled, eclipsing even the Yongle Encyclopedia (completed in 1408), which held the record for nearly 600 years. [5]
Wikipedia has become one of the most recognised brands in the world and for many people it is the portal to knowledge in the 21st century." [2] "People trust Wikipedia authors more than trained journalists—and perhaps they're right to." [3]
In plain English, my question is: Why is Wikipedia not accepted as a source? This is the simple reason, as people claim: Wikipedia is a community-made up; farmers bring in their fruits and vegetables, chefs and the women tend to it, and the kids bring water and other ingredients. Then, the village jerk comes and defecates in the soup.
Wikipedia, like other encyclopedias, is a tertiary source and provides overviews of a topic by indicating reliable sources of more extensive information. The goal of a Wikipedia article is to present a neutrally written summary of existing mainstream knowledge in a fair and accurate manner with a straightforward, " just-the-facts style ".