Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
[4] Erich Fromm's (1900–1980) factors were acquiring and assimilating things ("assimilation"), and reacting to people ("socialization"). These two factors form four types of character, which he calls Receptive, Exploitative, Hoarding and Marketing. Also deserving mention is a single scale invented in the 1940s by Karen Horney (1885–1952 ...
Rather than rely on the factors obtained by these researchers, [4] Warren Norman performed an independent analysis of Allport and Odbert's terms in 1963. [19] Despite finding a five-factor structure similar to Fiske's, Norman decided to use Allport and Odbert's original list to create a more precise and better-structured taxonomy of terms. [ 20 ]
The factors that explain life satisfaction roughly map (negatively) to those factors that explain misery. They are first and foremost diagnosed depression/anxiety, which explains twice as much as the next factor, physical health (number of medical conditions), that explains just as much variance in subjective well-being between people, as ...
[4] [5] Herzberg often referred to hygiene factors as "KITA" factors, which is an acronym for "kick in the ass", the process of providing incentives or threat of punishment to make someone do something. According to Herzberg, the absence of hygiene factors causes dissatisfaction among employees in the workplace.
Cultural factors may influence this decision, as different cultures value different things, and subcultures may have different priorities when it comes to purchasing decisions. Social class , including wealth, education, and occupation may affect one's purchasing behavior.
Philosopher Brian Leftow has argued that the question cannot have a causal explanation (as any cause must itself have a cause) or a contingent explanation (as the factors giving the contingency must pre-exist), and that if there is an answer, it must be something that exists necessarily (i.e., something that just exists, rather than is caused ...
Currently, a nuanced opinion of linguistic relativity is espoused by most linguists holding that language influences certain kinds of cognitive processes in non-trivial ways, but that other processes are better considered as developing from connectionist factors. Research emphasizes exploring the manners and extent to which language influences ...
The main factors that influence group cohesiveness are: members' similarity, [15] [16] group size, [17] entry difficulty, [18] group success [19] [20] and external competition and threats. [ 21 ] [ 22 ] Often, these factors work through enhancing the identification of individuals with the group they belong to as well as their beliefs of how the ...