Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The first part of Zeckendorf's theorem (existence) can be proven by induction. For n = 1, 2, 3 it is clearly true (as these are Fibonacci numbers), for n = 4 we have 4 = 3 + 1. If n is a Fibonacci number then there is nothing to prove. Otherwise there exists j such that F j < n < F j + 1 .
A proof by induction consists of two cases. The first, ... where is the n-th Fibonacci number, and = (+) (the golden ratio) and = are the roots ...
A quick proof of Cassini's identity may be given (Knuth 1997, p. 81) by recognising the left side of the equation as a determinant of a 2×2 matrix of Fibonacci numbers. The result is almost immediate when the matrix is seen to be the n th power of a matrix with determinant −1:
A Fibonacci prime is a Fibonacci number that is prime. The first few are: [46] 2, 3, 5, 13, 89, 233, 1597, 28657, 514229, ... Fibonacci primes with thousands of digits have been found, but it is not known whether there are infinitely many. [47] F kn is divisible by F n, so, apart from F 4 = 3, any Fibonacci prime must have a prime index.
The usual Fibonacci numbers are a Fibonacci sequence of order 2. The cases n = 3 {\displaystyle n=3} and n = 4 {\displaystyle n=4} have been thoroughly investigated. The number of compositions of nonnegative integers into parts that are at most n {\displaystyle n} is a Fibonacci sequence of order n {\displaystyle n} .
The Fermat numbers satisfy the following recurrence relations: = + = + for n ≥ 1, = + = for n ≥ 2.Each of these relations can be proved by mathematical induction.From the second equation, we can deduce Goldbach's theorem (named after Christian Goldbach): no two Fermat numbers share a common integer factor greater than 1.
In mathematics, the greedy algorithm for Egyptian fractions is a greedy algorithm, first described by Fibonacci, for transforming rational numbers into Egyptian fractions. An Egyptian fraction is a representation of an irreducible fraction as a sum of distinct unit fractions, such as 5 / 6 = 1 / 2 + 1 / 3 .
Lamé's Theorem is the result of Gabriel Lamé's analysis of the complexity of the Euclidean algorithm.Using Fibonacci numbers, he proved in 1844 [1] [2] that when looking for the greatest common divisor (GCD) of two integers a and b, the algorithm finishes in at most 5k steps, where k is the number of digits (decimal) of b.