enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Marks v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marks_v._United_States

    Marks v. United States, 430 U.S. 188 (1977), is a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States that explained how the holding of a case should be viewed where there is no majority supporting the rationale of any opinion.

  3. List of landmark court decisions in the United States

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_landmark_court...

    This case featured the first example of judicial review by the Supreme Court. Ware v. Hylton, 3 U.S. 199 (1796) A section of the Treaty of Paris supersedes an otherwise valid Virginia statute under the Supremacy Clause. This case featured the first example of judicial nullification of a state law. Fletcher v.

  4. Judicial opinion - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judicial_opinion

    A unanimous opinion is one in which all of the justices agree and offer one rationale for their decision. A majority opinion is a judicial opinion agreed to by more than half of the members of a court. A majority opinion sets forth the decision of the court and an explanation of the rationale behind the court's decision.

  5. Bite mark analysis has no basis in science, experts now say ...

    www.aol.com/news/bite-mark-analysis-no-basis...

    The bite mark expert in his case recanted his testimony, saying he now knows he cannot say whether a bite mark on the victim matched McCrory’s teeth. Yet the Alabama courts have declined to free ...

  6. Supreme Court refuses to hear bite mark case - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/supreme-court-refuses-hear-bite...

    The U.S. Supreme Court declined Tuesday to review the case of an Alabama man who has spent decades in prison for a murder conviction supported by recanted and discredited testimony about bite marks.

  7. Non-publication of legal opinions in the United States

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-publication_of_legal...

    An unpublished opinion is a decision of a court that is not available for citation as precedent because the court deems the case to have insufficient precedential value. In the system of common law, each judicial decision becomes part of the body of law used in future decisions. However, some courts reserve certain decisions, leaving them ...

  8. In re Caremark International Inc. Derivative Litigation

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_re_Caremark...

    The shareholders of Caremark International, Inc. brought a derivative action, alleging the directors breached their duty of care by failing to put in place adequate internal control systems. This in turn was said to enable the company's employees to commit criminal offences, resulting in substantial fines and civil penalties amounting to over ...

  9. Legal opinion - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_opinion

    If a court decides that an opinion should be published, the opinion may be included in a volume from a series of books called law reports ('reporters' in the United States). Published opinions of courts are also collectively referred to as case law, and constitute in the common law legal systems one of the major sources of law. [1]