Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The columns in a candidate key are called prime attributes, [3] and a column that does not occur in any candidate key is called a non-prime attribute. Every relation without NULL values will have at least one candidate key: Since there cannot be duplicate rows, the set of all columns is a superkey, and if that is not minimal, some subset of ...
A database relation (e.g. a database table) is said to meet third normal form standards if all the attributes (e.g. database columns) are functionally dependent on solely a key, except the case of functional dependency whose right hand side is a prime attribute (an attribute which is strictly included into some key).
A non-prime attribute of a relation is an attribute that is not a part of any candidate key of the relation. Put simply, a relation (or table) is in 2NF if: It is in 1NF and has a single attribute unique identifier (UID) (in which case every non key attribute is dependent on the entire UID), or
Every non-trivial functional dependency either begins with a superkey or ends with a prime attribute (attributes depend only on candidate keys) [5] Every non-trivial functional dependency either begins with a superkey or ends with an elementary prime attribute (a stricter form of 3NF) —
There is no B → A relationship. B → C direct dependency relationship exists. Then the functional dependency A → C is a transitive dependency (which follows the axiom of transitivity). In database normalization, one of the important features of third normal form is that it excludes certain types of transitive dependencies.
In the Today's court bookings table, there are no non-prime attributes: that is, all attributes belong to some candidate key. Therefore, the table adheres to both 2NF and 3NF. The table does not adhere to BCNF. This is because of the dependency Rate type → Court in which the determining attribute is Rate type, on which Court depends.
Relation, tuple, and attribute represented as table, row, and column respectively. In database theory, a relation, as originally defined by E. F. Codd, [1] is a set of tuples (d 1,d 2,...,d n), where each element d j is a member of D j, a data domain. Codd's original definition notwithstanding, and contrary to the usual definition in ...
In database normalization, unnormalized form (UNF or 0NF), also known as an unnormalized relation or non-first normal form (N1NF or NF 2), [1] is a database data model (organization of data in a database) which does not meet any of the conditions of database normalization defined by the relational model.