Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Women are more likely to support animal rights than men. [2] [3] A 1996 study of adolescents by Linda Pifer suggested that factors that may partially explain this discrepancy include attitudes towards feminism and science, scientific literacy, and the presence of a greater emphasis on "nurturance or compassion" amongst women. [4]
Social attitudes towards women vary as greatly as the members of society themselves. From culture to culture, perceptions about women and related gender expectations differ greatly. In recent years, there has been a great shift in attitudes towards women globally as society critically examines the role that women should play, and the value that ...
The gathering of wild plants is more often a women's occupation; however, these tasks often overlapped, with men and women working on the same project but with different duties. [38] Despite hunting itself being more commonly a male task, women also participate by building lodges, processing hides into apparel, and drying meat.
Pet humanization is the practice in pet culture of treating companion animals with a level of care, attention, and luxury relatively higher than for the average domesticated animal. This trend involves the owners being at odds with the pet's status as property in wider society and can range from relying on them for emotional support to treating ...
Animal welfare often [110] refers to a utilitarian attitude towards the well-being of nonhuman animals. It believes the animals can be exploited if the animal suffering and the costs of use is less than the benefits to humans.
Some researchers have suggested that since speciesism could be considered, in terms of social psychology, a prejudice (defined as "any attitude, emotion, or behaviour toward members of a group, which directly or indirectly implies some negativity or antipathy toward that group"), then laypeople may be aware of a connection between it and other ...
According to a 2000 paper by Harold Herzog and Lorna Dorr, previous academic surveys of attitudes toward animal rights tended to have small sample sizes and non-representative groups. [75] But a number of factors appear to correlate with people's attitudes about the treatment of animals and animal rights.
Ethical conflicts between enjoying meat and caring for animals may be made less problematic by holding positive attitudes towards meat. [1] [85] People who think of meat as safe, nutritious, and sustainable tend to experience less ambivalence about eating it. [85] Religious belief in God-given dominion over animals can also justify eating meat ...