Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The identity is named after Alexandre-Théophile Vandermonde (1772), although it was already known in 1303 by the Chinese mathematician Zhu Shijie. [1] There is a q-analog to this theorem called the q-Vandermonde identity. Vandermonde's identity can be generalized in numerous ways, including to the identity
As with the (non-q) Chu–Vandermonde identity, there are several possible proofs of the q-Vandermonde identity. The following proof uses the q -binomial theorem . One standard proof of the Chu–Vandermonde identity is to expand the product ( 1 + x ) m ( 1 + x ) n {\displaystyle (1+x)^{m}(1+x)^{n}} in two different ways.
Alexandre-Théophile Vandermonde (28 February 1735 – 1 January 1796) was a French mathematician, musician, and chemist who worked with Bézout and Lavoisier; his name is now principally associated with determinant theory in mathematics. He was born in Paris, and died there.
Lagrange's identity; Lagrange's trigonometric identities; List of logarithmic identities; MacWilliams identity; Matrix determinant lemma; Newton's identity; Parseval's identity; Pfister's sixteen-square identity; Sherman–Morrison formula; Sophie Germain identity; Sun's curious identity; Sylvester's determinant identity; Vandermonde's identity ...
Q-Vandermonde identity; Quintuple product identity; R. Rogers–Ramanujan continued fraction; Rogers–Ramanujan identities; S. Selberg's identity;
An m × n rectangular Vandermonde matrix such that m ≤ n has rank m if and only if all x i are distinct. An m × n rectangular Vandermonde matrix such that m ≥ n has rank n if and only if there are n of the x i that are distinct. A square Vandermonde matrix is invertible if and only if the x i are distinct. An explicit formula for the ...
This list of mathematical series contains formulae for finite and infinite sums. It can be used in conjunction with other tools for evaluating sums. Here, is taken to have the value
It can also be interpreted as an identity of formal power series in X, where it actually can serve as definition of arbitrary powers of power series with constant coefficient equal to 1; the point is that with this definition all identities hold that one expects for exponentiation, notably (+) (+) = (+) + ((+)) = (+).