Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Hadacheck v. Sebastian, 239 U.S. 394 (1915), was an early U.S. Supreme Court case on the constitutionality of zoning ordinances. [1] The Court held that an ordinance of Los Angeles, California, prohibiting the manufacturing of bricks within specified limits of the city did not unconstitutionally deprive the petitioner of his property without due process of law, or deny him equal protection of ...
Los Angeles v. Alameda Books, Inc., 535 U.S. 425 (2002), was a United States Supreme Court case on the controversial issue of adult bookstore zoning in the city of Los Angeles. Zoning laws dictated that no adult bookstores could be within five hundred feet of a public park, or religious establishment, or within 1000 feet of another adult ...
With a key vote coming on a bid to rezone Los Angeles to add 250,000 more homes, city ... The study calls the 1972 development blueprint for Westwood “a useful case study for how zoning rollback ...
Zoning laws in major cities originated with the Los Angeles zoning ordinances of 1904 [4] [5] and the New York City 1916 Zoning Resolution. [6] Early zoning regulations were in some cases motivated by racism and classism, particularly with regard to those mandating single-family housing.
Single-family zoning makes it practically impossible to build more housing in central L.A. Los Angeles Zoning Laws Pushed People and Homes Toward Fire-Prone Areas Skip to main content
[48] [49] In the City of Los Angeles, the date is October, 1978. [50] [51] These exemptions, however, may leave most of a city's total rental stock under rent control. For example, in San Francisco, as of 2014, about 75% of all rental units were rent controlled, [52] and in Los Angeles in 2014, 80% of multifamily units were rent controlled. [53]: 1
(The Center Square) - The Los Angeles City Council is voting for a one-year eviction moratorium on Friday for anyone “economically impacted” by the wildfires, which the regional apartment ...
First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. Los Angeles County, 482 U.S. 304 (1987), was a 6–3 decision of the United States Supreme Court.The court held that the complete destruction of the value of property constituted a "taking" under the Fifth Amendment even if that taking was temporary and the property was later restored.