Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
[23] [24] This was the first time NASA did not specifically list space exploration as a priority. [25] The NASA Authorization Act of 2010, passed on October 11, 2010, authorized funds for NASA for fiscal year 2011–2013, and enacted many of his stated space policy goals. A total of $58 billion in funding is called for, spread across three years.
Johnson-Freese, as recently as January 2008 in a workshop sponsored by the Space Studies Board of the National Research Council, has promoted a global leadership role for NASA because of its vast resources and has indicated that the free passing of spacecraft under the Bush policy should fall under a legal realm rather than leave it to U.S to ...
One reason for SpaceX’s relative success is that NASA concentrates on “one-off projects focused on ‘quantum leaps’ — the Space Shuttle or the Space Launch System,” whereas Musk’s ...
As a federal agency, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration receives its funding from the annual federal budget passed by the United States Congress.The following charts detail the amount of federal funding allotted to NASA each year over its history to pursue programs in aeronautics research, robotic spaceflight, technology development, and human space exploration programs.
Why NASA hasn't made a decision yet So NASA is taking the time to run its data and options through three "technical authorities:" a chief engineer, a chief health and medical officer, and a chief ...
Others included a bill that helped NASA and the International Space Station. Another area was tied to Head Start, which helps provide early childhood education to low-income students.
NASA has doled out billions to work with private companies on space hauls. It’s still unclear what value the space agency is getting for taxpayers’ money. The stranded astronauts are stoic.
[4] [16] A recurring argument was the contrast with NASA's contribution to the International Space Station (ISS), a similar dollar amount. [4] Critics of the project ( Congressmen representing other US states and scientists working in non-SSC fields who felt the money would be better spent on their own fields) [ 4 ] argued that the US could not ...