enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Systematic review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systematic_review

    A systematic review is a scholarly synthesis of the evidence on a clearly presented topic using critical methods to identify, define and assess research on the topic. [1] A systematic review extracts and interprets data from published studies on the topic (in the scientific literature), then analyzes, describes, critically appraises and summarizes interpretations into a refined evidence-based ...

  3. Critical appraisal - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_appraisal

    Critical appraisal (or quality assessment) in evidence based medicine, is the use of explicit, transparent methods to assess the data in published research, applying the rules of evidence to factors such as internal validity, adherence to reporting standards, conclusions, generalizability and risk-of-bias.

  4. Users' Guides to the Medical Literature - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Users'_Guides_to_the...

    These articles, introducing the term "critical appraisal", appeared in the Canadian Medical Association Journal beginning in 1981. In 1990, Dr. Gordon Guyatt introduced the term "evidence-based medicine" to stress the role of rigorous, systematic evidence from clinical research in conjunction with patients’ values and preferences in clinical ...

  5. Literature review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Literature_review

    A literature review is an overview of previously published works on a particular topic. The term can refer to a full scholarly paper or a section of a scholarly work such as books or articles. Either way, a literature review provides the researcher/author

  6. Evidence-based nursing - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidence-based_nursing

    To begin the critical appraisal process, three questions need to be asked to determine the relevance of evidence and if evidence applies to population being cared for. The three questions are: Are the results of the study valid? What are the results? Will the results be applicable in caring for patients? Question 1 measures the validity.

  7. Wikipedia : Identifying reliable sources (medicine)

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying...

    This page in a nutshell: Ideal sources for biomedical material include literature reviews or systematic reviews in reliable, third-party, published secondary sources (such as reputable medical journals), recognised standard textbooks by experts in a field, or medical guidelines and position statements from national or international expert bodies.

  8. AOL Mail

    mail.aol.com

    Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!

  9. Review article - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Review_article

    The process of review articles being peer-reviewed is critical to their credibility. [9] The peer review process is a way to ensure the article is as polished and accurate as possible. Most often, those reviewing the article are fellow academics or experts within the field under discussion in the paper.