enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Vanishing gradient problem - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vanishing_gradient_problem

    The gradient thus does not vanish in arbitrarily deep networks. Feedforward networks with residual connections can be regarded as an ensemble of relatively shallow nets. In this perspective, they resolve the vanishing gradient problem by being equivalent to ensembles of many shallow networks, for which there is no vanishing gradient problem. [17]

  3. Long short-term memory - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_short-term_memory

    In theory, classic RNNs can keep track of arbitrary long-term dependencies in the input sequences. The problem with classic RNNs is computational (or practical) in nature: when training a classic RNN using back-propagation, the long-term gradients which are back-propagated can "vanish", meaning they can tend to zero due to very small numbers creeping into the computations, causing the model to ...

  4. Backpropagation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Backpropagation

    Backpropagation computes the gradient of a loss function with respect to the weights of the network for a single input–output example, and does so efficiently, computing the gradient one layer at a time, iterating backward from the last layer to avoid redundant calculations of intermediate terms in the chain rule; this can be derived through ...

  5. Residual neural network - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Residual_neural_network

    Sepp Hochreiter discovered the vanishing gradient problem in 1991 [20] and argued that it explained why the then-prevalent forms of recurrent neural networks did not work for long sequences. He and Schmidhuber later designed the LSTM architecture to solve this problem, [ 4 ] [ 21 ] which has a "cell state" c t {\displaystyle c_{t}} that can ...

  6. Rectifier (neural networks) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rectifier_(neural_networks)

    Sparse activation: for example, in a randomly initialized network, only about 50% of hidden units are activated (i.e. have a non-zero output). Better gradient propagation: fewer vanishing gradient problems compared to sigmoidal activation functions that saturate in both directions. [4] Efficiency: only requires comparison and addition.

  7. Green's function - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Green's_function

    If the problem is to solve a Dirichlet boundary value problem, the Green's function should be chosen such that G(x,x′) vanishes when either x or x′ is on the bounding surface. Thus only one of the two terms in the surface integral remains. If the problem is to solve a Neumann boundary value problem, it might seem logical to choose Green's ...

  8. Gradient descent - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gradient_descent

    Gradient descent can also be used to solve a system of nonlinear equations. Below is an example that shows how to use the gradient descent to solve for three unknown variables, x 1, x 2, and x 3. This example shows one iteration of the gradient descent. Consider the nonlinear system of equations

  9. Activation function - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Activation_function

    Nontrivial problems can be solved using only a few nodes if the activation function is nonlinear. [ 1 ] Modern activation functions include the logistic ( sigmoid ) function used in the 2012 speech recognition model developed by Hinton et al; [ 2 ] the ReLU used in the 2012 AlexNet computer vision model [ 3 ] [ 4 ] and in the 2015 ResNet model ...