Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Richard E. Roeper (born October 17, 1959) [1] is an American columnist and film critic for the Chicago Sun-Times. He co-hosted the television series At the Movies with Roger Ebert from 2000 to 2008, serving as the late Gene Siskel's successor. [2] [3] From 2010 to 2014, he co-hosted The Roe and Roeper Show with Roe Conn on WLS-AM. [4]
Cruz did all of her close-up action scenes, though her pregnancy forced the filmmakers to use a stunt double on more of the wide shots. [7] In September 2010, after it became noticeable on set at Puerto Rico, representatives of Cruz and Bardem confirmed she was four-and-a-half months pregnant. [8]
Of the 18 reviews, it determined an average rating of 6.4 out of 10. It gave the film a score of 67%. [19] Richard Roeper of the Chicago Sun-Times wrote, "Paul and young Danny Murphy are terrific together, with Paul playing a wounded bear growling his lines and Murphy delivering a fully realized performance. And for such a bleak and harsh tale ...
Richard Roeper of Chicago Sun-Times rated the film 3.5 stars out of 4 called the film a "small but ambitious and metaphysical and deeply poetic gem with big ideas, stunningly original visuals of Chicago — and beautifully honed performances from a cast that includes talented young actors and some veteran performers who bring a grounded, real-world, seen-it-all wisdom to their respective and ...
Film critic Richard Roeper gave the film an F, calling it "an ugly, tasteless, deadly and mean-spirited piece of filmmaking," and would later call it the worst film of 2012. [12] [13] Justin Chang of Variety called it "a shameless celebration of degenerate behavior, a work of relentless vulgarity and staggering moral idiocy."
READ MORE: Chris Matthews: Ted Cruz Is 'Troll-Like,' 'Operates Below the Level of Human Life' "I've enjoyed listening to him [Cruz] even though we don't agree on everything," the actor went on to say.
Morgan received mixed reviews from critics. Rotten Tomatoes has given the film an approval rating of 37%, based on 155 reviews, with a weighted average score of 5.00/10. The site's critical consensus reads, " Morgan neglects to develop its decent premise, opting instead to settle for a garden-variety sci-fi thriller with more action than ideas."
[7] On Metacritic, the film has a score 73 out of 100 based on 33 reviews, indicating "generally favorable reviews". [8] Particularly favorable reviews came from Richard Roeper [9] and Leonard Maltin, with the latter praising the film as "the best movie so far" of the first half of 2007. [10]