enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Intentional tort - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intentional_tort

    An intentional tort is a category of torts that describes a civil wrong resulting from an intentional act on the part of the tortfeasor (alleged wrongdoer). The term negligence, on the other hand, pertains to a tort that simply results from the failure of the tortfeasor to take sufficient care in fulfilling a duty owed, while strict liability torts refers to situations where a party is liable ...

  3. United States tort law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_tort_law

    Causation is typically a bigger issue in negligence cases than intentional torts. However, as mentioned previously, it is an element of any tort. The defendant's act must be an actual cause and a proximate cause of the result in a particular cause of action.

  4. Garratt v. Dailey - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garratt_v._Dailey

    Dailey, 46 Wash. 2d 197, 279 P.2d 1091 (Wash. 1955) is an American tort law case that illustrates the principle of "intent" for intentional torts. [ 1 ] [ 2 ] [ 3 ] Background

  5. Sheridan v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sheridan_v._United_States

    In a majority opinion by Justice Stevens, the Court noted that the injury arose from two claims: negligence by Carr's co-workers and assault by Carr. In United States v. Muniz, 374 U.S. 150 (1963), the Supreme Court held that the intentional tort exception did not apply when prison guards were negligent in preventing a prisoner from assault ...

  6. Outline of tort law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outline_of_tort_law

    Conversion (law) – An intentional tort to personal property where the defendant's willful interference with the chattel deprives plaintiff of the possession of the same. Nuisance – Denial of quiet enjoyment to owners of real property. A private nuisance is an unreasonable, unwarranted, or unlawful interference with another person's private ...

  7. Legal malpractice - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_malpractice

    A loss or injury to the client caused by the negligence, and Financial loss or injury to the client. To satisfy the third element, legal malpractice requires proof of what would have happened had the attorney not been negligent; that is, "but for" the attorney's negligence ( "but for" causation ). [ 3 ]

  8. images.huffingtonpost.com

    images.huffingtonpost.com/2012-03-23-1130Jud_01.pdf

    %PDF-1.4 %âãÏÓ 9 0 obj > endobj xref 9 15 0000000016 00000 n 0000000786 00000 n 0000000864 00000 n 0000000993 00000 n 0000001111 00000 n 0000001552 00000 n 0000001973 00000 n 0000002429 00000 n 0000002506 00000 n 0000002752 00000 n 0000002992 00000 n 0000003232 00000 n 0000005400 00000 n 0000005789 00000 n 0000000596 00000 n trailer ...

  9. Summers v. Tice - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Summers_v._Tice

    Decided November 17, 1948; Full case name: Charles A. Summers v. Howard W. Tice, et al. Citation(s) 33 Cal.2d 80 199 P.2d 1: Holding; When a plaintiff suffers a single indivisible injury, for which the negligence of each of several potential tortfeasors could have been a but-for cause, but only one of which could have actually been the cause, all the potential tortfeasors are jointly and ...