enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. LL parser - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LL_parser

    The parsing table instructs it to apply rule (1) from the grammar and write the rule number 1 to the output stream. The stack becomes: [ F, +, F, ), $] The parser now has an 'a' on its input stream and an 'F' as its stack top. The parsing table instructs it to apply rule (3) from the grammar and write the rule number 3 to the output stream.

  3. LALR parser generator - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LALR_parser_generator

    An LALR parser generator accepts an LALR grammar as input and generates a parser that uses an LALR parsing algorithm (which is driven by LALR parser tables). In practice, LALR offers a good solution, because LALR(1) grammars are more powerful than SLR(1), and can parse most practical LL(1) grammars.

  4. LALR parser - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LALR_parser

    The standard example of an LR(1) grammar that cannot be parsed with the LALR(1) parser, exhibiting such a reduce/reduce conflict, is: [10] [11] S → a E c → a F d → b F c → b E d E → e F → e In the LALR table construction, two states will be merged into one state and later the lookaheads will be found to be ambiguous.

  5. LR parser - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LR_parser

    Most LR parsers are table driven. The parser's program code is a simple generic loop that is the same for all grammars and languages. The knowledge of the grammar and its syntactic implications are encoded into unchanging data tables called parse tables (or parsing tables). Entries in a table show whether to shift or reduce (and by which ...

  6. LL grammar - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LL_grammar

    An LL(1) grammar with symbols that have both empty and non-empty derivations is also an LALR(1) grammar. An LL(1) grammar with symbols that have only the empty derivation may or may not be LALR(1). [9] LL grammars cannot have rules containing left recursion. [10] Each LL(k) grammar that is ε-free can be transformed into an equivalent LL(k ...

  7. Comparison of parser generators - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_parser...

    Regular languages are a category of languages (sometimes termed Chomsky Type 3) which can be matched by a state machine (more specifically, by a deterministic finite automaton or a nondeterministic finite automaton) constructed from a regular expression.

  8. Top-down parsing - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top-down_parsing

    Top-down parsing in computer science is a parsing strategy where one first looks at the highest level of the parse tree and works down the parse tree by using the rewriting rules of a formal grammar. [1] LL parsers are a type of parser that uses a top-down parsing strategy.

  9. Simple LR parser - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simple_LR_parser

    In computer science, a Simple LR or SLR parser is a type of LR parser with small parse tables and a relatively simple parser generator algorithm. As with other types of LR(1) parser, an SLR parser is quite efficient at finding the single correct bottom-up parse in a single left-to-right scan over the input stream, without guesswork or backtracking.