Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The legal argument focused on Trump’s official acts, with both sides agreeing that a former president does not have immunity for personal conduct. The Supreme Court intervened after a federal ...
In a landmark ruling with a potentially major impact on the 2024 presidential campaign, a U.S. Supreme Court majority ruled that presidents — including former President Donald Trump — have ...
Instead of dismissing the federal election interference case, the Supreme Court sent certain elements of the indictment back to a lower court to review which conduct is protected and immune from ...
Trump's team asked the Supreme Court to reject the expedited timeline and allow the appeals court to consider the case first. [29] [30] On December 22, the Supreme Court denied the special counsel's request, leaving the case to the appeals court. [31] On January 9, 2024, the D.C. Court of Appeals heard arguments in the immunity dispute.
The Supreme Court on Monday ruled for the first time that former presidents have broad immunity from prosecution, extending the delay in the Washington criminal case against Donald Trump on ...
What it means: The Supreme Court ruled that Trump may have immunity for some of his alleged conduct in his federal election interference case because it falls under "official acts." Chief Justice ...
On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that former President Donald Trump can claim immunity from prosecution. The landmark decision could delay the trial relating to the case accusing Trump of ...
Smith, who brought the charges against Trump, wrote to the Supreme Court that even if it finds that some level of immunity exists for official acts, a trial could still get underway focused on ...