enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Putative marriage - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Putative_marriage

    Putative marriages exist in both Catholic canon law and in various civil laws, though the rules may vary. In some jurisdictions, putative marriages are a matter of case law rather than legislation. In many jurisdictions, under civil law, the marriage becomes valid if the impediment is removed.

  3. Michael H. v. Gerald D. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_H._v._Gerald_D.

    Michael H. v. Gerald D., 491 U.S. 110 (1989), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States involving substantive due process in the context of paternity law.

  4. Validation of marriage - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Validation_of_marriage

    In Catholic canon law, a validation of marriage or convalidation of marriage is the validation of a Catholic putative marriage. A putative marriage is one when at least one party to the marriage wrongly believes it to be valid. [1] Validation involves the removal of a canonical impediment, or its dispensation, or the removal of defective ...

  5. Family Who “Tortured” And Left Arranged Marriage Bride ...

    www.aol.com/lifestyle/family-tortured-left...

    Her husband Asgar Sheikh, 31, father-in-law Khalid Skeikh, 55, and mother-in-law Shabnam Sheikh, were jailed last year for 23 years. Sister-in-law Shagufa, 29, was given a suspended sentence.

  6. Void marriage - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Void_marriage

    A marriage that is entered into in good faith, but that is later found to be void, may be recognized as a putative marriage and the spouses as putative spouses, with certain rights granted by statute or common law, notwithstanding that the marriage itself is void. [3]

  7. Zablocki v. Redhail - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zablocki_v._Redhail

    Agreeing with Justice Powell, Rehnquist concludes that there is no fundamental right to marriage. Further he would conclude that the appropriate measure for this case is the rational basis test [14] —that the law need be only rationally related to a legitimate State interest. Rehnquist contended that the appropriate frame of analysis for the ...

  8. Roldan v. Los Angeles County - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roldan_v._Los_Angeles_County

    Roldan v. Los Angeles County, 129 Cal. App. 267, 18 P.2d 706, was a 1933 court case in California confirming that the state's anti-miscegenation laws at the time did not bar the marriage of a Filipino and a white person. [1] However, the precedent lasted barely a week before the law was specifically amended to illegalize such marriages. [2]

  9. 10 years later, Hawaii's marriage equality law has ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/10-years-later-hawaiis-marriage...

    Dec. 1—In 1998, 69 % of Hawaii residents supported a constitutional amendment that marriage should be reserved only for opposite-sex genders. Today same-sex marriages have about 70 % support ...