enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Chicago Lawyers' Committee For Civil Rights Under Law v ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_Lawyers'_Committee...

    Chicago Lawyers' Committee For Civil Rights Under Law v. Craigslist , 519 F.3d 666 (7th Cir. 2008), [ 1 ] is a Seventh Circuit decision affirming a lower court ruling that Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (CDA) provides immunity to Internet service providers that "publish" classified ads that violate the Fair Housing Act (FHA).

  3. Shakman v. Democratic Organization of Cook County - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shakman_v._Democratic...

    The case has never been fully resolved. Despite the necessary negotiations the court required, they have not all been settled. However, Rahm Emanuel believes that the ongoing case may soon be over, and has stated that the Chicago government is closer than ever to negotiating a proper balance of standards that both parties agree to. [6]

  4. McDonald v. Board of Election Commissioners of Chicago

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McDonald_v._Board_of...

    Board of Election Commissioners of Chicago, 394 U.S. 802 (1969), [1] was a unanimous decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that an Illinois law that denied absentee ballots to inmates awaiting trial did not violate their constitutional rights under the Fourteenth Amendment.

  5. City of Chicago v. Morales - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_of_Chicago_v._Morales

    City of Chicago v. Morales , 527 U.S. 41 (1999), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a law cannot be so vague that a person of ordinary intelligence can not figure out what is innocent activity and what is illegal.

  6. American Bar Association Model Code of Professional ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Bar_Association...

    The American Bar Association Model Code of Professional Responsibility, created by the American Bar Association (ABA) in 1969, was a set of professional standards designed to establish the minimum baseline of legal ethics and professional responsibility generally required of lawyers in the United States.

  7. McDonald v. City of Chicago - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McDonald_v._City_of_Chicago

    McDonald v. City of Chicago, 561 U.S. 742 (2010), was a landmark [1] decision of the Supreme Court of the United States that found that the right of an individual to "keep and bear arms", as protected under the Second Amendment, is incorporated by the Fourteenth Amendment and is thereby enforceable against the states.

  8. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

    images.huffingtonpost.com/2013-03-09-amicus.pdf

    Case 1:10-cv-01067-RBW-DAR Document 212 Filed 12/14/12 Page 8 of 38 2 led the Project’s extensive and transparent approval process fully complied with all applicable

  9. In re Himmel - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_re_Himmel

    Months earlier, in a case cited in this decision, In re Anglin, 122 Ill.2d 531, 525 N.E.2d 550 (May 18, 1988), the Illinois Supreme Court refused to reinstate the law license of an attorney convicted of (among other felonies) possessing stolen securities, and who wished to be reinstated while continuing to withhold the name of the person or ...