Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
This template adds notice that the article may not meet a notability guideline, either in general or one in particular. Template parameters [Edit template data] This template prefers inline formatting of parameters. Parameter Description Type Status Guideline 1 An identifier for an applicable notability guideline: Academics, Prof, Astro, Bio, Biography, Biographies, Book, Books, Companies ...
An extensive set of subject-specific guideline pages for different aspects of notability can be found at Category:Wikipedia notability guidelines, with subject specific essays and proposed guidelines at Category:Wikipedia notability. Wikipedia's article on Notability in the English Wikipedia. For commentary and discussion of this guideline, see ...
{{Example farm}} – For excessive use of examples. {{Too many see alsos}} – For an indiscriminate "See also" section, most of which should be pruned or integrated into the prose. Topical trivia {{In popular culture}} – For excessive "popular culture" and "media references" sorts of material.
On Wikipedia, notability is a test used by editors to decide whether a given topic warrants its own article. For people, the person who is the topic of a biographical article should be "worthy of notice" [1] or "note" [2] —that is, "remarkable" [2] or "significant, interesting, or unusual enough to deserve attention or to be recorded" [1] within Wikipedia as a written account of that person ...
For example, if a notable person has a website, then the website does not "inherit" notability from its owner. In such cases, it is often best to describe the website in the article about the notable person. Similarly, a website may be notable, but the owners or authors do not "inherit" notability due to the web content they wrote.
This template should always be substituted (i.e., use {{subst:Uw-notability}}). Any accidental transclusions will be automatically substituted by a bot. Any accidental transclusions will be automatically substituted by a bot.
He concluded that "Wikipedia's notability policy resembles U.S. immigration policy before 9/11: stringent rules, spotty enforcement." [6] David Segal observed that "Wiki-worthiness has quietly become a new digital divide, separating those who think they are notable from those granted the imprimatur of notability by a horde of anonymous geeks." [8]
Advice about how to create a valid Wikipedia article Template parameters [Edit template data] Parameter Description Type Status type type The kind of article proposed: one of 'CORP', 'ORG', 'BIO', 'MUSIC, or 'FILM' String optional paid paid 'Yes' if the editor is a paid contributor String optional indent indent 'Yes' if the text is to be indented one level String optional The above ...