Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
List of Chairpersons of the Armed Forces Tribunal [5]; Sr No Chairperson Term 1 A K Mathur 1 September 2008 7 August 2013 2 Prakash Chandra Tatia: 23 August 2013 [6]: March 2016 [6]
First published in 1989, Relating to the Armed Forces in India [12] was the first and only book covering rulings given by Supreme Court and various High Courts on military law and service conditions of the armed forces as well as civilians paid from the defence estimates and ex-servicemen. All the important judgments, reported or unreported ...
Pages in category "Indian National Army personnel who were court-martialed" The following 8 pages are in this category, out of 8 total. This list may not reflect recent changes .
The military members of the Courts of Appeals are selected by the Ministry of Justice on motion of the Ministry of Defence. The military members of the Supreme Court are selected by the President of Finland. [5]: §11 The sentences of the courts for military crimes are served in civilian prisons.
Protects army personnel from civil court trials for actions taken in line of duty (except in certain cases). Gives military authorities the power to maintain strict discipline during operations. Significance of the Army Act, 1950: Ensures strict discipline within the army. Defines a separate judicial system for handling offenses.
Tribunals in India are quasi-judicial bodies for settling various administrative and tax-related disputes, including matters that are under the jurisdiction of Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), National Green Tribunal (NGT), Competition Appellate Tribunal (COMPAT) and Securities Appellate ...
A court-martial (plural courts-martial or courts martial, as "martial" is a postpositive adjective) is a military court or a trial conducted in such a court. A court-martial is empowered to determine the guilt of members of the armed forces subject to military law, and, if the defendant is found guilty, to decide upon punishment.
It functioned until the Supreme Court of India was established in 1950. Although the seat of the Federal Court was at Delhi, however, a separate Federal Court of Pakistan was established in Pakistan at Karachi after the Partition of India. There was a right of appeal to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in London from the Federal ...