Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
A good article (GA) is a Wikipedia article that meets a core set of editorial standards, the good article criteria, passing through the good article nomination process successfully. They are well-written, contain factually accurate and verifiable information, are broad in coverage, neutral in point of view , stable, and illustrated, where ...
The main types of narrative reviews are evaluative, exploratory, and instrumental. [2] A fourth type of review, the systematic review, also reviews literature (the scientific literature), but because the term literature review conventionally refers to narrative reviews, the usage for referring to it is "systematic review." A systematic review ...
Wikipedia:What the Good article criteria are not—GA reviews should be concluded only in accordance with the GA criteria, not personal preferences; Wikipedia:Compare criteria Good v. Featured article; Wikipedia:Did you know eligibility criteria—within 7 days of promotion, a GA article may be nominated for a DYK hook review
Articles start with a lead section (WP:CREATELEAD) summarising the most important points of the topic.The lead section is the first part of the article; it comes above the first header, and may contain a lead image which is representative of the topic, and/or an infobox that provides a few key facts, often statistical, such as dates and measurements.
A book review may be a primary source, an opinion piece, a summary review, or a scholarly view. [2] Books can be reviewed for printed periodicals, magazines, and newspapers, as school work, or for book websites on the Internet. A book review's length may vary from a single paragraph to a substantial essay.
A review article is an article that summarizes the current state of understanding on a topic within a certain discipline. [1] [2] A review article is generally considered a secondary source since it may analyze and discuss the method and conclusions in previously published studies.
This writing style relies on presenting reasoned opinions supported by evidence that substantiates the central thesis. [1] [2] Examples of persuasive writing include criticisms, reviews, reaction papers, editorials, proposals, advertisements, and brochures, all of which employ various persuasive techniques to influence readers.
Wikipedia's peer review is a way to receive ideas on how to improve articles that are already decent. It may be used for potential good article nominations, potential featured article candidates, or an article of any "grade" (but if the article isn't well-developed, please read here before asking for a peer review).