Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
JSON Pointer [10] defines a string syntax for identifying a single value within a given JSON value of known structure. JSONiq [11] is a query and transformation language for JSON. XPath 3.1 [12] is an expression language that allows the processing of values conforming to the XDM [13] data model. The version 3.1 of XPath supports JSON as well as ...
(JSON Schema Proposal, other JSON schemas/IDLs) Partial (via JSON APIs implemented with Smile backend, on Jackson, Python) — SOAP: W3C: XML: Yes W3C Recommendations: SOAP/1.1 SOAP/1.2: Partial (Efficient XML Interchange, Binary XML, Fast Infoset, MTOM, XSD base64 data) Yes Built-in id/ref, XPointer, XPath: WSDL, XML schema: DOM, SAX, XQuery ...
JSON Schema specifies a JSON-based format to define the structure of JSON data for validation, documentation, and interaction control. It provides a contract for the JSON data required by a given application and how that data can be modified. [29] JSON Schema is based on the concepts from XML Schema (XSD) but is JSON-based. As in XSD, the same ...
File metadata, including the schema definition. The 16-byte, randomly-generated sync marker for this file. For data blocks Avro specifies two serialization encodings: [6] binary and JSON. Most applications will use the binary encoding, as it is smaller and faster. For debugging and web-based applications, the JSON encoding may sometimes be ...
Concise Data Definition Language (CDDL, RFC 8610): [1] A Notation for CBOR and JSON data structures; CortoScript: Describe data and/or interfaces for systems that require Semantic interoperability; Etch: Cisco's Etch Cross-platform Service Description Language; Extensible Data Notation (EDN): Clojure data format, similar to JSON
For a more comprehensive listing of data structures, see List of data structures. The comparisons in this article are organized by abstract data type . As a single concrete data structure may be used to implement many abstract data types, some data structures may appear in multiple comparisons (for example, a hash map can be used to implement ...
The terms schema matching and mapping are often used interchangeably for a database process. For this article, we differentiate the two as follows: schema matching is the process of identifying that two objects are semantically related (scope of this article) while mapping refers to the transformations between the objects.
In some domains, a few dozen different source and target schema (proprietary data formats) may exist. An "exchange" or "interchange format" is often developed for a single domain, and then necessary routines (mappings) are written to (indirectly) transform/translate each and every source schema to each and every target schema by using the interchange format as an intermediate step.