Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Concern over risk from artificial intelligence has led to some high-profile donations and investments. In 2015, Peter Thiel, Amazon Web Services, and Musk and others jointly committed $1 billion to OpenAI, consisting of a for-profit corporation and the nonprofit parent company, which says it aims to champion responsible AI development. [121]
This "brittleness" can cause it to fail in unpredictable ways. [7] Narrow AI failures can sometimes have significant consequences. It could for example cause disruptions in the electric grid, damage nuclear power plants, cause global economic problems, and misdirect autonomous vehicles. [1] Medicines could be incorrectly sorted and distributed.
Examples of safety recommendations found in the literature include performing third-party auditing, [173] offering bounties for finding failures, [173] sharing AI incidents [173] (an AI incident database was created for this purpose), [174] following guidelines to determine whether to publish research or models, [144] and improving information ...
As much as this is a failure of the AI, it is also a failure of human imagination. Broussard traces the problem to the underlying assumption that you can build a “general purpose” conversation ...
The AI Overview issues, meanwhile, cropped up because Google said users were asking uncommon questions. In the rock-eating example, a Google spokesperson said it “seems a website about geology ...
AI, Failing Exhibition Sector Among Challenges to Be Examined by U.K. Parliamentary Inquiry Into Film and High-End TV Naman Ramachandran July 20, 2023 at 7:01 PM
Some researchers believe that some "incorrect" AI responses classified by humans as "hallucinations" in the case of object detection may in fact be justified by the training data, or even that an AI may be giving the "correct" answer that the human reviewers are failing to see. For example, an adversarial image that looks, to a human, like an ...
Weak AI hypothesis: An artificial intelligence system can (only) act like it thinks and has a mind and consciousness. The first one he called "strong" because it makes a stronger statement: it assumes something special has happened to the machine that goes beyond those abilities that we can test.