Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The California Rule is a legal doctrine requiring that government workers throughout the state of California receive the pension benefits that were in place on the day they were hired, and that those benefits cannot be reduced (though they can be increased); meaning that mandatory employee contributions cannot be increased, nor can cost-of-living allowances be decreased, not even for not-yet ...
The California Public Employees' Retirement System, or CalPERS, the nation's largest state pension fund, experienced a 6.1% investment loss in the fiscal year that ended June 30. It was the first ...
Proposition 162, also known as the "California Pension Protection Act of 1992," gave the PERS board "the sole and exclusive fiduciary responsibility over the assets of" PERS. [17] [21] To avoid confusion with public employees' retirement systems in other states, the organization's name was changed to "CalPERS" in 1992. [16]
GASB 45, or GASB Statement 45, is an accounting and financial reporting provision requiring government employers to measure and report the liabilities associated with (other than pension) postemployment benefits (or OPEB). Reported OPEBs may include post-retirement medical, pharmacy, dental, vision, life, long-term disability and long-term care ...
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us
The city would take a one-time overall hit of roughly $109 million to transfer the officers, and then the annual cost would be $6.3 million, mostly absorbed by the airport and the port.
Federal Employees Retirement System - covers approximately 2.44 million full-time civilian employees (as of Dec 2005). [2]Retired pay for U.S. Armed Forces retirees is, strictly speaking, not a pension but instead is a form of retainer pay. U.S. military retirees do not vest into a retirement system while they are on active duty; eligibility for non-disability retired pay is solely based upon ...
CalSTRS’ investment porftolio performed better than CalPERS and most U.S. pension funds. But it still lost money for 1st time since 2009.