Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
For example, in the fraction 3 / 4 , the numerator 3 indicates that the fraction represents 3 equal parts, and the denominator 4 indicates that 4 parts make up a whole. The picture to the right illustrates 3 / 4 of a cake. Fractions can be used to represent ratios and division. [1]
2 ⁄ 5: 0.4 Vulgar Fraction Two Fifths 2156 8534 ⅗ 3 ⁄ 5: 0.6 Vulgar Fraction Three Fifths 2157 8535 ⅘ 4 ⁄ 5: 0.8 Vulgar Fraction Four Fifths 2158 8536 ⅙ 1 ⁄ 6: 0.166... Vulgar Fraction One Sixth 2159 8537 ⅚ 5 ⁄ 6: 0.833... Vulgar Fraction Five Sixths 215A 8538 ⅛ 1 ⁄ 8: 0.125 Vulgar Fraction One Eighth 215B 8539 ⅜ 3 ⁄ 8 ...
In the second step, they were divided by 3. The final result, 4 / 3 , is an irreducible fraction because 4 and 3 have no common factors other than 1. The original fraction could have also been reduced in a single step by using the greatest common divisor of 90 and 120, which is 30. As 120 ÷ 30 = 4, and 90 ÷ 30 = 3, one gets
Slices of approximately 1/8 of a pizza. A unit fraction is a positive fraction with one as its numerator, 1/ n.It is the multiplicative inverse (reciprocal) of the denominator of the fraction, which must be a positive natural number.
A continued fraction is an expression of the form = + + + + + where the a n (n > 0) are the partial numerators, the b n are the partial denominators, and the leading term b 0 is called the integer part of the continued fraction.
This last non-simple continued fraction (sequence A110185 in the OEIS), equivalent to = [;,,,,,...], has a quicker convergence rate compared to Euler's continued fraction formula [clarification needed] and is a special case of a general formula for the exponential function:
In mathematics, the Farey sequence of order n is the sequence of completely reduced fractions, either between 0 and 1, or without this restriction, [a] which when in lowest terms have denominators less than or equal to n, arranged in order of increasing size.
For numbers of the form , the greedy algorithm will produce a four-term expansion whenever is 1 modulo 4, and an expansion with fewer terms otherwise. [3] Thus, another way of rephrasing the Erdős–Straus conjecture asks whether there exists another method for producing Egyptian fractions, using a smaller maximum number of terms for the ...